Herald SUrSHPU
The Herald of South-Ural state Humanities-Pedagogical University ЧГПУ

ISSN: 2618–9682; ISSN 1997-9886
Impact factor RSCI: 0,469

BACK TO ISSUE CONTENT | HERALD OF CSPU 2022 № 1 (167) Pedagogical sciences
SHOW FULL TEXT (IN RUSSIAN)
SHOW IN eLibrary
DOI: 10.25588/CSPU.2022.167.1.005
UDC: 378.811.161.1
BBC: 74.480.81.2/81.8стд1-9-2
I.G Kazachuk ORCID
Docent, Doctor of Philological Sciences, Professor at the Department of the Russian Language and Methods of Russian Language Teaching, South-Ural state Humanities-Pedagogical University
E-mail: Send an e-mail
N. V. Glukhikh ORCID
Doctor of Sciences (Philology), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of the Russian Language and Methods of Russian Language Teaching, South Ural State Humanitarian Pedagogical University
E-mail: Send an e-mail
A. A. Mironova ORCID
Docent, Doctor of Philological Sciences, Professor at the Department of Russian Language and Methods of Russian Language Teaching, South-Ural state Humanities-Pedagogical University
E-mail: Send an e-mail
PEDAGOGICAL OPPORTUNITIES FOR STUDYING NON-PERSONAL SENTENCES IN RUSSIAN LESSONS AT SCHOOL AND UNIVERSITY
Abstracts

Introduction. The study of syntax at school and university is aimed at implementing the anthropocentric approach common in modern linguistics. The formation of communicative competence in the process of teaching Russian syntax requires the inclusion of all ways of expressing syntactic functions. The use of procedural phraseological units as predicates of one-component sentences is an insufficiently studied, but important issue. Purpose of the article — To present the possibilities of effective study of the impersonal sentence at school and university, to argue the need to introduce examples of the phraseological fund into the circle of analyzed units.

Materials and methods. The main research methods are the analysis of scientific literature in the field of Russian syntax, the systematization of work experience in higher education, and pedagogical observation. In this article, the exercises for studying impersonal sentences with a procedural phraseological unit as the main member include examples of the use of such constructions in literary texts, which expands students' understanding of the inclusion of impersonal sentences in different genres and demonstrates the functionality of these units.

Results. The article presents the experience of teachers of the modern Russian language in the study of syntax at the Faculty of Philology. The tested exercises are aimed at revealing the functions and semantics of impersonal sentences of the same type.

Discussion. The article shows the ways of analyzing the predicative center of an impersonal sentence with a component - a procedural phraseological unit. The material of such an analysis allows solving logical and systemic problems in the course of teaching the Russian language.

Conclusion. The authors concluded that exercises that include the phraseological fund of the Russian language provide effective work on the formation of communicative skills and abilities of a modern teacher; all the necessary shades of meaning in the Russian literary language.

Keywords

Communicative competence; Russian language lesson; Impersonal offers; Procedural phraseological unit

Highlights

The main methods of studying an impersonal sentence are defined; author's methods of studying this topic in the course of modern Russian for undergraduate students are proposed;

The main forms of procedural phraseological units in the predicate of an impersonal sentence are presented, as well as the types of tasks aimed at forming the linguistic and communicative competence of graduates of a pedagogical university;

The problem of the correlation of procedural foraseologisms with verbs in semantic and grammatical terms is defined as one of the main ones for studying the predicate in an impersonal sentence at a university.

REFERENCES

1. Berezina O.A. (2010), K voprosu o yazykovoj reprezentacii kategorii bezlichnosti [To the question of linguistic representation of the category of impersonality]. Voprosy kognitivnoj lingvistiki, 4, 39 – 51. (In Russian).

2. Valgina N.S. (2003), Sovremennyj russkij yazyk: Sintaksis [Modern Russian: Syntax]. Vysshaya shkola, Moscow, 416 p. (In Russian).

3. Galkina-Fedoruk E.M. (2019), Bezlichnye predlozheniya v sovremennom russkom yazyke [Impersonal sentences in modern Russian], “URSS”, Moscow, 334 p. (In Russian).

4. Dolin YU.T. (2008), Voprosy teorii odnosostavnogo predlozheniya (na materiale russkogo yazyka) [Questions of the theory of one-part sentences (based on the Russian language)]. Izdatel'sko-poligraficheskij kompleks Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, Orenburg, 129 p. (In Russian).

5. Zolotova G.A. (2020), Ponyatie lichnosti/bezlichnosti i ego interpretacii [The concept of personality/impersonality and its interpretation], Russian linguistics. International Journal for the Study of the Russian Language, 24 (2), 103 – 115. DOI 10.1023/A:1007054326390 (In Russian).

6. Osipova E.N. (2009), Russkij sintaksis: odnosostavnost' predlozheniya [Russian syntax: one-part sentence]. Pomorskij gosudarstvennyj universitet im. M. V. Lomonosova, Arhangel'sk, 150 p. (In Russian).

7. Saidova M.S. (2018), Problema klassifikacii bezlichnyh predlozhenij v sovremennom russkom yazyke [The problem of classifying impersonal sentences in modern Russian], Sbornik statej VIII Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii “European Scientific Conference”, 07 yanvarya 2018 g. [A collection of materials of the VIII International Scientific and Practical Conference “European Scientific Conference”], Nauka i Prosveshchenie (Individual'nyj predprinimatel' Gulyaev G.Yu.), January 07, 2018, Penza, 2, pp. 42–45. (In Russian).

8. Selemeneva O.A. (2009), Bezlichnye predlozheniya v trudah otechestvennyh lingvistov XIX–XXI v.v. [Impersonal sentences in the works of Russian linguists of the 19th–21st centuries], Filologos, 3–4 (6), 132–140. (In Russian).

9. Skoblikova E.S. (2018), Sovremennyj russkij yazyk. Sintaksis prostogo predlozheniya (teoreticheskij kurs): uchebnoe posobie [Modern Russian language. Simple Sentence Syntax (Theoretical Course): Study Guide]. Flinta, Moscow, 320 p. (In Russian).

10. Gasheva L.P. (2002), Strukturno-grammaticheskie svojstva russkih frazeologizmov: kollektivnaya monografiya [Structural and grammatical properties of Russian phraseological units]. Kollektivnaya monografiya, Izdatel'stvo Chelyabinskogo gosdurastvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, Chelyabinsk, 263 p. (In Russian).

11. Yurchenko V.S. (2009), Prostoe predlozhenie v sovremennom russkom yazyke. Dvusostavnoe imennoe, odnosostavnoe glagol'noe, odnosostavnoe imennoe [A simple sentence in modern Russian. Two-part nominal, one-part verb, one-part nominal]. “URSS”, Moscow, 280 p. (In Russian).

12. Laguzova E.N., Melnikova E.M. (2021), The Study of Active Syntactic Processes in the School Course of Russian [The study of active processes in syntax in the school course of the Russian language]. Filologicheskijklass, 26 (1), 281–292. DOI 10.51762/1FK-2021-26-01-24. (In Russian).