Herald SUrSHPU
The Herald of South-Ural state Humanities-Pedagogical University ЧГПУ

ISSN: 2618–9682; ISSN 1997-9886
Impact factor RSCI: 0,312

BACK TO ISSUE CONTENT | HERALD OF CSPU 2018 № 1 PHILOLOGICAL SCIENCES
SHOW FULL TEXT (IN RUSSIAN)
SHOW IN eLibrary
DOI: 10.25588/CSPU.2018.01.25
UDC: 882
BBC: 83.3 (2 Рос=Рус)
J.A. Gimranova ORCID
postgraduate student of the Department of Literature and Methods of Teaching Literature, head of the teaching and methodical study of the Russian language, Ural State Humanitarian Pedagogical University (Chelyabinsk, Russia)
E-mail: Send an e-mail
Creative reeptions of Turgenev’s stories by Victor Pelevin
Abstracts

Introduction. The article reveals the links between contemporary Russian literature and Turgenev’s artistic heritage, and questions the impact of Turgenev’s intertext on the work of the postmodern writer.

Materials and methods. Based on the stories of “Cyberpunk, Christmas Eve – 117. dir”, “Blue Lantern”, “Sleep” by Victor Pelevin, with the use of receptive and intertextual analysis, the author has made an attempt to define the functions of Turgenev’s intertext in the modern Russian literature.

Results. The study has derived the main characteristics of literary remake as one of the forms used by modern writers in their work with cultural heritage of classical literature. The author also suggested the idea of why Pelevin refers to classical pretext.

Discussion. By applying to classical intertext the modern Russian literature promotes marketing goals and extends the readership through the use of recognizable pretexts, and that leads to actualization and revitalization of classical texts. Future research shall be aimed at considering Turgenev’s intertext in the works of other contemporary writers.

Conclusion. While studying the story “Cyberpunk, or Christmas Eve – 117. dir” we made a logical conclusion that it is a remake of Turgenev’s short story “Mumu” that echoes the problems and main plot twists of the pretext, and, at the same time uses the chronotopos of the present time, namely, the 1990s. Pelevin’s story “The Blue Lantern” is also a sort of reimagining of Turgenev’s “Bezhin Lea” in the language of modern times. The problem of balance between dream and reality, as well as between living dream and dead dream, that appears in Turgenev’s mystical story “The Dream”, has not only been remade by Pelevin but continuously developed in his “Sleep” and some further works, such as “Chapaev and Void” (Buddha’s Little Finger). The article attempts to identify the reasons why the modern writer refers to Turgenev’s intertext.

Keywords

INTERTEXT, TURGENEV, RECEPTION, PELEVIN, PERCEPTION, REMAKE, META-TEXTUALITY, CLASSICS, MODERNITY

Highlights
– The present article has analyzed Turgenev’s intertext in the stories by V. Pelevin “Cyberpunk, Christmas Eve - 117. dir”, “Blue Lantern”, and “Sleep”.
– The models of how a modern writer can work with classical pretext have been defined.
– The main characteristics of literary remake of classical piece of literature have been derived.
– The conclusions have been made about reasons that made V. Pelevin appeal to Turgenev’s intertext.
REFERENCES
1. Markova, T.N. (2003), Sovremennaja proza: konstrukcija i smysl [V. Makanin, L. Petrushevskaja, V. Pelevin]. M.: MGOU.
2. Kataev, V.B (2002), Igra v oskolki: Sud’by russkoj klassiki v jepohu postmodernizma [Playing with shards: Destiny of Russian classical literature in postmodern era]. M.: MGU Publ.
3. Bahtin, M.M. (1975), Voprosy literatury i jestetiki: issled. raznyh let [Questions of literature and aesthetics: research of different times]. M.: Hudozh. Lit. Publ.
4. Polubojarinova, L.N. (2017), Pevets samouvazhenija cheloveka v raskoldovannom mire: novaja kniga H.-Ju.Gerigka o Turgeneve [The singer of a man’s self-esteem in an unspelled world: a new book by H.-Ju. Gerik about Turgenev]. Russkaja literatura. 2, 224–226.
5. Kuz’mina, N.A. (1999), Intertekst i ego rol’ v processah jevoljucii pojeticheskogo jazyka: monografija [Intertext and its role in the process of evolution of the language: monograph]. Ekaterinburg-Omsk: Ural Institute Publ.
6. Bagrecov, D.N. (2005), Konstruktivnaja i destruktivnaja intertekstual’naja strategija (na primere proizvedenij T. Kibirova i V. Emelina) [Constructive and destructive intellectual strategy (as exemplified by works of T. Kibirov and V. Emelin]. Literatura v kontekste sovremennosti: Materialy II mezhdunar. nauch. konf. Cheljabinsk 25-26 fevralja 2005 g. Cheljabinsk: ChGPU Publ.
7. Nefagina, G.L. (1998), Russkaja proza vtoroj poloviny 80-h – nachala 90-h godov 20 veka [Russian prose of the late 80s – beginning of the 90s of the 20 century]. Minsk: Jekonompress.
8. Shulezhkova S.G. (2003), Problema smerti avtora v uslovijah “total’noj citatnosti” [The problems of the author’s death in the context of the “total citationality“]. Magnitogorsk: MaGU Publ.
9. Pelevin, V. (2008), Vse rasskazy [All short stories]. M.: Jeksmo Publ.
10. Turgenev, I.S. (1980), Polnoe sobranie sochinenij i pisem [Complete works and letters]: compl. works: in 30 vol. Vol. 4. M.: Nauka Publ.
11.  Bykov, D. (2016), Ivan Turgenev. Samyj neprochitannyj klassik. Sb. Lekcii po literature i ne tol’ko [Ivan Turgenev: The less read classic. Selected lectures and other works]. M.: Prjamaja rech’ Publ.
12. Turgenev, I.S. (1980), Polnoe sobranie sochinenij i pisem [Complete works and letters]. Vol. 3. M.: Nauka Publ.
13. Pelevin, V. (1991), Sinij fonar’: rasskazy [Blue torch: short stories]. M.: Tekst Publ.
14. Pelevin, V. (2009), Zheltaja strela [Yellow arrow]. M.: Eksmo Publ.
15. Genis, A. (1999), Ivan Petrovich umer: st. i rassledovanija [Ivan Petrovich is dead: articles and investigations]. M.: Novoe lit. obozrenie Publ.
16. Turgenev, I.S. (1980), Polnoe sobranie sochinenij i pisem [Complete works and letters]. M.: Nauka Publ.
17. Adamovich, M. (2001), Judif’ s golovoj Oloferna (psevdoklassika v russkoj literature 90-h) [Judith with Holofernes’ head (pseudo classical Russian literature of late 90s]. Novyj mir, 7, 165–174.
18. Lipoveckij, M.N. (1997), Russkij postmodernizm: ocherki istoricheskoj pojetiki [Russian postmodernism: sketches on historical poetics]. Ekaterinburg: UrGPU Publ.
19. Dubin, B. (2010), Klassika, posle i rjadom: sociologicheskie ocherki o literature i kul’ture [Classics, after­ and recently: sociological sketches about literature and culture]. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obo­zrenie Publ.
20. Fateeva, N.A. (1998), Tipologija intertekstual’nyh elementov i svjazej v hudozhestvennoj rechi [Typology of intellectual elements and relations in artistic speech]. M.: AN Literature and Language Series Publ.