Herald SUrSHPU The Herald of South-Ural state Humanities-Pedagogical University

BACK TO ISSUE CONTENT | HERALD OF CSPU • 2018• № 1• PEDAGOGICAL SCIENCES

DOI: 10.25588/CSPU.2018.01.16

UDC: 51(07):151.8

BBC: 22.1я7:88.4

V.V. Sibirev ORCID

Academic Title of Associate Professor, Candidate of Sciences (Education), Head of Department of Teaching Methods in Natural-Science Education and Information Technologies, Ulyanovsk State Pedagogical University (Ulyanovsk, Russia)
E-mail: Send an e-mail

Studying reasons for stopping the search for problem solution

Abstracts

Introduction. The present article considers reasons for termination of the search for problem solution. The purpose of the work is experimental control and refinement of the information flow model of the system «search of task solution», finding the relationship between the importance for the respondents, the labor intensity (energy intensity), the semantic and functional filling of the process steps and the termination of the process.

Methods and methods. The theoretical basis of the research is the synergetic methodology, system and process approaches. The research of system «search of task solution» is made from a position of the internal observer. Students and teachers are questioned about search of task solution. Statistical, canonical, correlation analysis of the data are used.

Results and discussion. The results of the experiment confirm the existence of six horizontal information flows in crisis. Each of these flows is divided into six steps corresponding to the management functions. Most often, the process stops at the last steps of the flows. The internal reasons of stopping the process are the lack of energy and resources, labor intensity, underestimation of the importance, non-fulfillment of some process steps, functional-semantic load of some of the steps, involving a termination of search of a solution, as one of the possible choices the system.

Conclusions. The results of the research contribute to the study of the structure of information flows of pedagogical systems during the crisis period. It can be used for mathematical modeling of the crisis from the inside. Results can be used in practice, when a teacher or scientific supervisor has a situational influence on the continuation or interruption of the solution process. The results will help scientist to deliberately plan activities during the passage of the creative crisis.

Keywords

SEARCH OF TASK SOLUTION, CRISIS, INFORMATION FLOWS, MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONS, RESOURCES, SELF-GOVERNMENT

Highlights

– The model of information flows of arbitrary pedagogical systems during the crisis is experimentally tested using the example of the system «search of the task solution».

– Relationship between the importance for the respondents, the labor intensity (energy intensity), the semantic and functional filling of the process steps and the stopping of the process at these steps is found by statistical methods.

– Some aspects of practical application of research results in educational and scientific activity are called.

REFERENCES

1.	Nagovitsyn R.S., Maksimov Y.G., Miroshnichenko A.A., Senator S.Y. (2017), Realizaciya didakticheskoy modeli podgotovki studentov k novatorstvu v processe nepreryvnogo obrazovaniya budushchego uchitelya [Implementation of the didactic model of preparing students for innovative practice within the framework of continuing teacher education]. Vestnik NGPU. 5, 7–24. Available at: http://vestnik.nspu.ru/article/2438 (Accessed: 20.12.2017). DOI: 10.15293/2226-3365.1705.01 (In Russian).
2.	Aksenov A.A. (2007), Teoriya obucheniya poisku resheniya shkolnykh matematicheskikh zadach [Theory of learning the search for the solution of school mathematical tasks], Oryol: OGU, Kartush Publ. (In Russian).
3.	Polya D. (1976), Matematicheskoe otkrytie. Reshenie zadach: osnovnye ponyatiay, izuchenie i prepodavanie [Mathematical discovery. Problem solving: basic concepts, study and teaching], M.: Nauka, Fizmatlit Publ. (In Russian).
4.	Fridman L.M., Turkish E.N. (1989), Kak nauchitsya reshat zadachi [How to learn to solve problems], M.: Prosveshchenie Publ. (In Russian).
5.	Frondenthal G. (1982), Matematika kak pedagogicheskaya zadacha [Mathematics as a pedagogical problem], M.: Prosveshchenie Publ. (In Russian).
6.	Firstov V.E. (2010), Kiberneticheskaya koncepciya i matematicheskie modeli upravleniya didacticheskimi processami pri obuchenii matematiki v shkole i vuze [Cybernetic concept and mathematical models of management didactic processes in teaching mathematics in school and university], Saratov: Izdatel’skij Centr “Nauka” Publ. (In Russian).
7.	Shchipanov V.V., Chernova Y.K., Krylova S.A. (2005), Matematicheskoe modelirovanie obrazovatelnykh processov [Mathematical modeling of educational processes], Togliatti, TGU Publ. (In Russian).
8.	Sibireva A.R. (2014), Matematicheskaya model’ samoupravleniya v social’nyh i pedagogicheskih sistemah [Mathematical model of self-management in social and pedagogical systems]. Vuzovskaya nauka v sovremennyh usloviyah: sbornik materialov 48 nauchno-tekhnicheskoj konferencii. Ul’yanovsk: UlGTU. 310–313. (In Russian).
9.	Milovanov V.P. (2001), Neravnovesnye socialno-economicheskie sistemy: sinergetica i samoorganizachiya [Nonequilibrium socio-economic systems: synergetics and self-organization], M.: Ehditorial URSS Publ. (In Russian).
10.	Zhegalov V.I., Kiyasov S.N. (2007), Prilogeniya obyknovennykh differencialnykh uravneny [Applications of ordinary differential equations], Kazan’: Izdatel’stvovo Kazanskogo gos. un-ta Publ. (In Russian).
11.	Sibirev V.V. (2011), Informacionnye potoki innovacionnoy deyatelnosti lichnosti [Information flows of innovational activity of the person]. Uchenye zapiski Pedagogicheskogo instituta Saratovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. N.G. CHernyshevskogo. Seriya: Psihologiya. Pedagogika. 1, 73–78. (In Russian).
12.	Sibirev V.V., Sibireva A.R. (2016), Strukturnaya organizaciya krizisa v pedagogicheskikh sistemakh [Structural organization of the crisis in pedagogical systems]. Kazanskij pedagogicheskij zhurnal. 2 (2), 236–242. (In Russian).
13.	Sibirev V.V. (2014), Upravlenie processom “poisk recheniya zadachi” [Managing the process of “finding a solution to the problem”]. Vestnik OGU. 11, 200–206. (In Russian).
14.	Budanov V.G. (2007), Metodologya sinergetiki v postneklassicheskoy nauke i v obrazovanii [Methodology of synergetic in postnonclassical science and in education], M.: URSS: Izd-vo LKI Publ. (In Russian).
15.	Malinetsky G.G. (2007), Matematicheskie osnovy sinergetiki [Mathematical foundations of synergetics], M.: Librokom Publ. (In Russian).
16.	Sibirev V.V., Sibireva A.R. (2013), Vliyanie sred na informacionnye potoki innovacii v pedagogicheskikh sistemax [The influence of environments on information flows of innovations in pedagogical systems]. Vestnik ChGPU. 4, 197–209. (In Russian).
17.	Konarzhevsky Y.A. (2000), Management i vnutrishkolnoe upravlenie [Management of educational organization], M.: Centr “Pedagogicheskij poisk” Publ. (In Russian).
18.	Tretyakov P.I. (2005), Operativnoe upravlenie kachestvom obrazovaniya v shkole [Operational quality management of education at school. Theory and practice. New technologies], M.: Skriptorij Publ. (In Russian).
19.	Shamova T.I., Tretyakov P.I., Kapustin N.P. (2002), Upravlenie obrazovatelnymi sistemami [Management of educational systems], M.: Vlados Publ. (In Russian).
20.	Sibireva A.R. (2014), Matematicheskie modeli, opisyvayushchie vliyanie sred na process vnedreniya innovacii v pedagogicheskih sistemah [Mathematical models describing the influence of environments on the process of introducing innovation in pedagogical systems]. Matematicheskie metody i modeli: teoriya, prilozheniya i rol’ v obrazovanii: Mezhdunarodnaya tekhnicheskaya konferenciya: sbornik nauchnyh trudov. Ulyanovsk. 272–277. (In Russian).