Herald SUrSHPU
The Herald of South-Ural state Humanities-Pedagogical University ЧГПУ

ISSN: 2618–9682; ISSN 1997-9886
Impact factor RSCI: 0,312

BACK TO ISSUE CONTENT | HERALD OF CSPU 2018 № 1 PEDAGOGICAL SCIENCES
SHOW FULL TEXT (IN RUSSIAN)
SHOW IN eLibrary
DOI: 10.25588/CSPU.2018.01.03
UDC: 42(07):378
BBC: 81.2-9
Yu.V. Volobueva ORCID
Academic Title of Associate Professor, Doctor of Sciences (Linguistics), Associate Professor, Department of Linguistic Education and Intercultural Communication, Surgut State Pedagogical University
E-mail: Send an e-mail
Yu.V. Surgay ORCID
Academic Title of Associate Professor, Doctor of Sciences (Linguistics), Associate Professor, Department of Linguistic Education and Intercultural Communication, Surgut State Pedagogical University
E-mail: Send an e-mail
Modeling educational process in teaching a foreign language based on systemic and activity-based approach as a part of the “practical course of english” for bachelors in education
Abstracts

Introduction. The article justifies the relevance of modeling in mastering subject and meta-subject skills as an example of activity approach realization for developing mental activity; the study overviews basic ideas suggested by modern scholars on the subject of activity approach implementation into educational environment in school and university practices. The article aims at justifying and revealing the author’s concept of effective organization of educational process in foreign languages based on the discussed approach.

Materials and methods. The main research methods involve analysis of scientific literature on the problem of activity approach, educational process implementation within the subject “Practical course of English”; as well as diagnostic methods, including observation, description, methods of statistical data processing.

Results. The study presents an innovative functional educational model that promotes the creation of conditions to model educational process content in “Practical course of English” course based on activity approach; the authors present characteristics of the model, its components, and the presented approach; the study identifies and describes methods and techniques for working with content of the discussed concept, which is identified as Recommended Sequence of Activities.

Discussion. The study demonstrates that the project is efficient when professionally developed students correspond to the model of graduate.

Conclusion. The authors have concluded that modeling the “Practical Course of English” lessons based on activity-based approach and its innovative educational model will contribute to the formation and development of students’ initiative and individual qualities that provide their successfulness in future life on national and international level.

Keywords

SUBJECT SKILLS, META-SUBJECT SKILLS, CONCEPT CONTENT, RECOMMENDED SEQUENCE OF ACTIVITIES, UNIVERSAL LEARNING ACTIVITIES, ACTIVITY-BASED APPROACH, COMPETENCY-BASED APPROACH, BACHELOR’S DEGREE MODEL, EDUCATIONAL PROCESS MODELING, LEARNING ACTIVITY SUBJECT

Highlights
  • The article defines components of activity-based approach, identified its features and requirements.
  • The study workes out the innovative functional educational model, promoted and created special conditions for the content of educational process modeling involving activity-based approach.
  • The authors present effective practices and experience for the use of activity-based approach.
REFERENCES
  1. Lasarev V.S. (2011), Konzeptualnaya model formirovaniya professionalnikh umeniy studentov [Concept model of students’ professional skills formation]. Surgut: Vestnik Surgutskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. (in Russian).
  2. Lasarev V.S. (2017), Nauchnoye obespecheniye kompetentnostnogo podkhoda v professionalnom obrazovanii [Scientific support of competence-based approach in vocational education]. Surgut: Vestnik Surgutskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. (in Russian).
  3. Nosova L.N. (2011), Deyatelnostny podkhod k formirovaniyu subyektnoy pozitsii studenta vysshego uchebnogo zavedeniya [Activity-based approach to developing subject position of university students]. Surgut: Surgutskiy gosudarstvenniy pedagogicheskiy universitet Publ. (in Russian).
  4. Nosova L.N. (2013), Razvitiye lichnosti buduschego uchitelya kak subyekta pedagogicheskoy deyatelnosti [Teacher’s individual development as a subject of pedagogical process], Surgut: Vestnik Surgutskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. (in Russian).
  5. Nosova L.N. (2017), Realizatsiya deyatelnostnoy modeli formirovaniya metapredmetnikh umeniy v nachalnoy shkole [Implementing activity-based model for formation of meta-subject results at primary school]. Tomsk: Pedagogical Review Publ. (in Russian).
  6. Nosova L.N. (2013), Formirovaniye predmetnikh i metapredmetnikh umeniy [Subject and meta-subject skills formation]. Krasnodar: Theory and practice of social development. (in Russian).
  7. Asmolo A.G. (2010), Formirovanie universalnykh uchebnykh deystviy v osnovnoy shkole: ot deystviya k mysli [Designing universal learning activities in secondary school: from action to thought: a teacher’s guide]. M.: Prosveshchenie Publ. (in Russian).
  8. Davydov V.V. (2000), Vidy obobscheniya v obuchenii [Types of generalization in learning]. Moscow: Pedagogical society in Russia Publ. (in Russian)
  9. Konoplina N.V. (2010), Razvitiye pedagogicheskogo vuza: metodologiya, teoriya, opyt [Pedagogical university development: methodology, theory, experience]. Yekaterinburg: Humanitarian University Publ. (in Russian).
  10. Lasarev V.S. (2002), Sistemnoye razvitiye shkoly [System development of school]. M.: Pedagogical society in Russia Publ. (in Russian).
  11. Kasprzhak, A.G. (2014), Prioritet obrazovatelnikh resultatov kak instrument modernizatsii program podgotovki uchiteleye [The priority of educational outcomes as a tool for modernization of teachers training programs]. M: Psychological Science & Education Publ. (in Russian).
  12. Lasarev V.S. (2008), Upravleniye innovatsiyami v shkole [Innovation management at school]. M.: Center of pedagogical education Publ. (in Russian).
  13. Lasarev V.S. (2010), Ponyatiya umstvennogo deystviya i ego formirovaniya v teoriyakh [Concepts of mental action and its formation in the theories by Pyotr Galperin and Vasily Davydov]. Voprosy psikhologii. 4, 119–128. (in Russian).
  14. Barker, Ph. Student-centered activity-based learning and teaching using technology: Engineering Subject Centre Teaching Awards/ Ph. Barker. Available at: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/student-centred-activity-based-learning-and-teaching-using-technology-engineering (assessed: 15.02.2015). (in English).
  15. Putnam A.R. (2002), Problem-based teaching and learning in technology education. Research report submitted to Educational Resources Clearinghouse / A.R. Putnam. Available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED465039 (assessed: 15.02.2015). (in English).
  16. Margolis A.A. Trebovaniya k modernizatsii osnovnykh obrazovatelnykh program [Requirements to professional educational programs modernization]. Available at: http://psyedu.ru/journal/2014/2/ Margolis.phtml (in Russian).
  17. Leontyev A.N. (2004), Deyatelnost. Soznaniye. Lichnost [Activity. Consciousness. Individuality]. M.: Smysl Academiya. (in Russian).
  18. Davydov V.V. (1996), Teoriya razvivauschego obucheniya [Theory of education development]. M.: Intor. (in Russian).
  19. Margolis A.A. (2014), Problemy i pespektivy razvitiya pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya v Rossii [Problems and perspectives of pedagogical education development in Russia]. Pedagogical science and education. 3, 50–55. (in Russian).
  20. Hall M.P. Reconstructing “education” through mindful attention: positioning the mind at the centre of curriculum and pedagogy. N. Dartmouth: Journal of Transformative Education. 16, (1), 78–80.
  21. Theresa Catalano, Madhur Shende and Emily K.Suh (2018), Developing multilingual pedagogies and research through language study and reflection. Vol. 15. 1, 1–18.
  22. Parto S. Khansari, Leanne Coyne (2018), An innovative addition to team-based-learning pedagogy to enhance teaching and learning students’ perceptions of team exams. Vol. 10. 1, 90–95.