Herald SUrSHPU
The Herald of South-Ural state Humanities-Pedagogical University ЧГПУ

ISSN: 2618–9682; ISSN 1997-9886
Impact factor RSCI: 0,469

BACK TO ISSUE CONTENT | HERALD OF CSPU 2021 № 2 (162) Psychological sciences
SHOW FULL TEXT (IN RUSSIAN)
SHOW IN eLibrary
DOI: 10.25588/CSPU.2021.162.2.008
UDC: 378.937 : 4
BBC: 74.480.8 : 81.0
A. V. Sviridova ORCID
Docent, Doctor of Philological Sciences, Professor at the Department of Russian Language, Literature and Methods of Teaching Russian Language and Literature, South-Ural state Humanities-Pedagogical University
E-mail: Send an e-mail
G. A. Shiganova ORCID
Professor (Full), Doctor of Philological Sciences, Professor at the Department of Russian Language, Literature and Methods of Teaching Russian Language and Literature, South-Ural state Humanities-Pedagogical University
E-mail: Send an e-mail
L. P. Yuzdovа ORCID
Professor, Doctor of Philology, Professor of the Department of Russian Language, Literature and Methods of Teaching Russian and Literature, South-Ural State Humanities-Pedagogical University
E-mail: Send an e-mail
E. Yu. Nikitina ORCID
Professor (Full), Doctor of Pedagogic Sciences, Professor at the Department of Theory, Methodology and Management of Primary Education, South-Ural state Humanities-Pedagogical University
E-mail: Send an e-mail
LINGUOCULTUROLOGICAL ESSENCE OF PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS AS AN OBJECT OF DEVELOPMENT IN THE PROCESS OF FORMATION OF BILINGUISM
Abstracts

Introduction. The article is devoted to phraseological units considered as an object under study at primary school. The author defines the concepts of studying Russian phraseology in terms of extra-practice and additional lessons. Linguistic and cultural peculiarities are essential points to study as they are not only the key issues of phraseology, but they also facilitate memorizing and understanding processes. The author demonstrates the necessity of learning phraseological units and idioms at additional Russian lessons at primary school. The article aims at identifying and analyzing the key features of learning phraseological units at primary school according to their linguistic characteristics. It is necessary to emphasize structural, informative, figurative, attitudinal and emotional peculiarities of phraseologisms at the first learning stages. Russian phraseological units can be classified according to different criteria. The process of teaching pupils these classifications must depend on cognitive complexity of pupils’ gnostic sphere.

Materials and methods. The main methods of study used in the article are descriptive, distributive and quantitative. Using these methods enable the author to acknowledge the possibility of effective phraseology learning in relation to pupil’s cognitive abilities.

Results. The features of the structure of educational activities in primary school in the study of the phraseological level of the Russian language. Linguistic and cultural features  semantic of  phraseological units are presented as one of the stimulating conditions for the development of  these units by school children.

Discussion. The purpose of the development of philological disciplines is the formation of basic knowledge about the diversity of the breadth and unity of the cultural and linguistic space traditional and innovative methods.

Conclusion. The study of the phraseological level is characterized as a condition for the formation of communicative competence: phraseological units more accurately nominate objects and their features, and, therefore, communicants, using them in communication, will be able to better convey information, express their attitude.

Keywords

Phraseological units; Сognitive; Сognition; Linguistic characteristics; General studying activities; Сompetence

Highlights

Phraseological level successfully and systematically mastered in primary school due to the special linguisticnature; 

Mastering the phraseological level makes it possible to implement the interactive principal of learning;

Mastering the phraseological level forms communicative competence.

REFERENCES

1. Gladilina, I.P. (2008), Razvitiye tvorcheskikh sposobnostey v uchebno-vospitatel'noy deyatel'nosti [Development of creative abilities in educational activities], Teoreticheskiy i nauch-no-metodicheskiy zhurnal “Vospitaniye shkol'nikov”, 9, 14–18. (In Russian).

2. Shmachilina S.V. (2010), Issledovatel'skaya kul'tura starsheklassnikov: formirovaniye i dignostika [Research culture of high school students: formation and diagnosis], Teoreticheskiy i nauch-no-metodicheskiy zhurnal “Vospitaniye shkol'ni-kov”, 1, 3–9. (In Russian).

3. Prazdnikova A.B. (2010), Pedagogicheskiye idei D. S. Likhacheva i formirovaniye tsennostnykh oriyentatsiy podrostkov [Pedagogical ideas of D.S. Likhachev and the formation of value orientations in adolescents], Teoreticheskiy i nauch-no-metodicheskiy zhurnal “Vospitaniye shkol'ni-kov”, 3, 29–34. (In Russian).

4. Yefrocinina, L.A. (2012), Urok — vazhneysheye usloviye formirovaniya univer-sal'nykh uchebnykh deystviy [The lesson is the important means of forming universal leaning activites], Yezhemesyachnyy nauchno-metodicheskiy zhurnal “Nachal'naya shkola”, 2, 49–57. (In Russian).

 5. Alefirenko N.F. & Semenenko N.N. (2009), Frazeologiya i paremiologiya [Phraseology and paremiology (a textbook)], Flinta; Nauka, Moscow, 344 p. (In Russian).

6. Alexandrova O.M. & Gosteva Yu.N. (2017), K realizatsii kontseptsii prepoda-vaniya russkogo yazyka i literatury v Rossiyskoy Federatsii (metodicheskiye re-komendatsii “Formirova-niye chitatel'skoy gramotnosti uchashchikhsya osnovnoy shkoly”) [Towards the implementation of the concept of teaching the Russian language and literature in the Russian Federation (Methodical recommendations “Formation of reading literacy of pupils of the basic school”)], Russkiy yazyk v shkole, 1, 3–12. (In Russian).

 7. Glazkov A.V. & Glazkova Ye.A. (2017), Narrativnyye teksty i ikh ispol'zovaniye v sopostavitel'nom chtenii [Narrative texts and their use in comparative reading], Russkiy yazyk v shkole, 1, 17–21. (In Russian).

8. Nikitina Ye.Y. & Egorova K.V. (2014), Teoretiko-metodologicheskiy regulyativ formirovaniya kommunika-tivnoy kompetentsii budushchikh uchiteley [Theoretical and methodological regulators of the formation of communicative competence of future teachers], Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosu-darstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 9.2, 100–113. (In Russian).

9. Matveyeva T.N. (2016), Sopostavitel'noye izucheniye frazeologii v usloviyakh mezhkul'turnoy kommunikatsii [Comparative study of phraseology in the context of intercultural communication], Dinamika yazykovykh i kul'turnykh protsessov v sovremennoy Rossii, 5, 1906–1909. (In Russian).

10. V'yushkova L.N. (2019), Rabota s frazeologizmom na perekrestke kul'tur [Working with phraseological units at the crossroads of cultures], Aktual'nyye problemy filologii i metodiki prepodavaniya inostrannykh yazykov, 13, 11–17. (In Russian).

11. Mayorenko I.A. (2017), Frazeologicheskoye kontseptualizirovaniye kak osnova natsional'noy mental'nosti v russkom i angliyskom yazykakh [Phraseological conceptualization as the basis of national mentality in Russian and English], Elektronnyy setevoy politematicheskiy zhurnal «Nauchnyye trudy Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta», 8, 150–157. (In Russian).

12. Turdi-Akhanova I.A. (2020), Frazeologizmy v tadzhikskom yazyke [Phraseologisms in the Tajik language], Mezhdunarodnyy nauchno-issledovatel'skiy zhurnal, 2-2 (92), 47–49. (In Russian).

13. Andreeva Ya.E. (2019), Elektronnyy frazeologicheskiy trenazher v obuchenii inostrantsev russkomu yazyku [Electronic phraseological trainer in teaching Russian language to foreigners], Nizhnevartovskiy filologicheskiy vestni, 1, 29–34. (In Russian).