Introduction. The relevance of expanding and refining the range of modern teaching methods in the system of vocational training of pedagogical cadres is determined by the need to ensure not only the ability of teachers to use the training and self-learning methods in a specific or pedagogical learning models, but also to choose and design new methods in the information and communication space for increasing the effectiveness. The importance of the highlighted skills is fixed in the documents of the domestic and international levels. At the same time, the evaluation (expert evaluation) and the construction of methods should be based on a theoretical basis that allows validly evaluate the received or chosen training method from the point of view of computer didactics. Such kind of work can be done on the basis of obtained in the process of training knowledge and experience, for example, during the performance of special tasks with a certain content filling various forms of organization of educational and cognitive activities.

Materials and Methods. The main research methods are: analysis of normative and recommendatory documents, as well as scientific literature that reveals the problem of updating teaching methods in the system of vocational training, comparison of the results connecting with the studies about the effectiveness of the formation of social and professional competencies for magistracy students.

Results. The author suggests subjects for selected blocks of the logical structure of organizational forms of work with undergraduates (course “Pedagogical Education”) and gives examples which can be used for lecture, seminar and laboratory classes, as well as research activities. The study presents the four-aspect test of the undergraduates’ skill formation for process of modern teaching method selection, compilation and estimation.

Discussion. The paper emphasizes that the process of forming skills to evaluate and independently compose methods of teaching with the help of a computer requires special theoretical and practical training and it has a complex nature.

Conclusion. The results of the proposed materials can be used not only in the system of master’s training, but also at the level of the bachelor’s degree, and during teachers’ professional development.

• The study presents the logical structure of organizational forms of work with undergraduates (course of “Pedagogical education”);
• The author employs the content topic to form the master’s degree students’ skills to design and evaluate teaching methods in the ideology of computer didactics;
• Illustrative materials for the formation of knowledge and accumulation of experience in the compilation and evaluation of modern teaching and self-learning methods during using information and communication technologies are presented.

1. Vagramenko Ya.A., Yalamov G.Yu., Il’ina V.S. (2014) Sovremennye nauchno-tekhnologicheskie podhody k vyboru programmnogo obespecheniya informacionnyh sistem dlya realizacii lichnostno-orientirovannyh traektorij professional’noj podgotovki i profil’nogo obucheniya [Modern scientific and technological approaches to the selection of software for information systems for the implementation of personality-oriented trajectories of vocational training and profile training] Pedagogika informatiki. 4, 72–82. (In Russian).

2. Lapenok M.V., Lapenok O.M., Simonova A.A. (2015) Preparation and evaluation of teachers’ readiness for creation and usage of electronic educational resources in school’s educational environment. Smart education and smart e-learning, Smart innovation, system and technologies. 41, 299–308. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-19875-0_27.

3. Robert I.V. (1994) Sovremennye informacionnye tekhnologii v obrazovanii: didakticheskie problemy, perspektivy ispol’zovaniya [Modern information technologies in education: didactic problems, prospects of use] Moscow, Shkola-Press Publ. (In Russian).

4. Starichenko B.E. (2012) O postroenii informacionnogo obespecheniya uchebnogo processa v vuze [On the construction of information support for the educational process in the university] Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii. 5, 39–44. (In Russian).

5. Adelsberger H., Kinshuk, Pawlowski, MartinJ. (2008) Handbook on Information Technologies for Education and Training. Springer-VerlagBerlinHeidelberg Publ. 465. DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-74155-8.

6. Anastasiades P., Zaranis N. (2017) Research on e-Learning and ICT in Education. Technological, Pedagogical and Instructional Perspectives. Springer International Publishing. 301. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-34127-9.

7. Zhang J., Yang J., Chang M. (2016) ICT in Education in Global Context. Springer Science Publ., Business Media Singapore Publ. 302. DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-0373-8.

8. Isaias P., Ifenthaler D., Kinshuk, Sampson D.G., Spector M. (2012) Towards Learning and Instruction in Web 3.0. Advances in Cognitive and Educational Psychology. Springer-VerlagNew York Publ. 326. DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-1539-8.

9. Moller L., Huett J.(2012) The Next Generation of Distance Education. Unconstrained Learning. Springer-VerlagNew York Publ. 266. DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-1785-9.

10. Starichenko B.E., Semenova I.N., Slepukhin A.V. (2014) Analiz sushchnosti ehektronnogo, distancionnogo i smeshannogo obucheniya s tochki zreniya sovremennoj infokommunikacionnoj obrazovatel’noj paradigmy [Analysis of the essence of electronic, distance and mixed education in terms of modern infocommunication educational paradigm] Pedagogicheskiy zhurnal Bashkortostana. 6, 49–65. (In Russian).

11. Semenova I.N. (2016) Modelirovanie rasshirennoj sistemy metodov obucheniya «Sovremennoj» obrazovatel’noj paradigmy v smeshannoj modeli obucheniya studentov pedagogicheskih special’nostej [Modeling of the extended system of teaching methods of the “Modern” educational paradigm using a mixed model of learning students of pedagogical specialties] Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii. 7, 67–76. (In Russian).

12. Bespal’ko V.P. (2002) Obrazovanie i obuchenie s uchastiem komp’yuterov (pedagogika tret’ego tysyacheletiya) [Education and training with the participation of computers (Pedagogics of the third millennium)] Moscow, Moskovskii psihologo-social’nyj institute Publ.; Voronezh, NPO MODEK Publ. (In Russian).

13. Sardak, L.V., Kamalidinova E.R. (2017) Osobennosti podgotovki ehlektronnyh obrazovatel’nyh resursov dlya ispol’zovaniya pri realizacii mobil’nogo obucheniya [Features of the preparation of electronic educational resources using with implementation of mobile training] Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii. 6, 53–59. (In Russian).

14. Semenova I.N. (2013) Methodology of teaching mathematics methods designing in the modern educational paradigm. Yelm, WA, USA. Science Book Publishing House, 156.

15. Semenova I.N. (2014) Sushchnost’ i rol’ metoda yazykovogo menedzhmenta v razvitii sistemy elektronnogo obucheniya matematike [The essence and role of the language management method in the development of e-learning system of mathematics] Pedagogicheskiy zhurnal Bashkortostana. 3, 63–72. (In Russian).

16. Starichenko B.E., Semenova I.N., Slepukhin A.V. (2016) Proektirovanie dissertacii magistra obrazovaniya [Master’s Degree Design] Saint Petersburg, Lan’ Publ. (In Russian).

17. Semenova I.N. (2017) Priemy organizacii informacionno-poiskovoj i analitiko-sinteticheskoj deyatel’nosti dlya podgotovki studentov k provedeniyu nauchnogo issledovaniya v didakticheskoj srede sovremennogo informacionno-kommunikacionnogo prostranstva [Methods of organizing information search and analytical and synthetic activities to prepare students for scientific research in the didactic environment of the modern information and communication space] Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii. 6, 106–110. (In Russian).

18. Slepukhin A.V., Semenova I.N., Erentraut E.N. (2017) Konvencial’no-refleksivnaya sistema ehkspertirovaniya dlya formirovaniya u studentov pedagogicheskih vuzov umenij sostavlyat’ i ocenivat’ metody obucheniya v sovremennoj didakticheskoj srede [Conventional and reflexive system of expertise to form in the pedagogical universities students’ skills to compose and evaluate the teaching methods in the modern didactic environment] Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii. 6, 120–129. (In Russian).

19. Slepukhin A.V. (2016) Proektirovanie komponentov metodiki formirovaniya professional’nyh umenij studentov pedagogicheskih vuzov v usloviyah ispol’zovaniya virtual’noj obrazovatel’noj sredy [Design the components of the methodology to form the professional students of pedagogical universities’ skills in conditions of using a virtual educational environment] Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii. 7, 82–90. (In Russian).

 20. Mamontova M., Zuev P. (2015) Training of future teachers in development and application of computer tools for evaluation of student academic progress. Smart Education and Smart e-Learning. Smart Innovation, System and Technologies. 41, 321–331. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-19875-0_29.

21. Slepukhin A.V., Sergeeva N.N. (2015) The diagnostics’ methods of students’ readiness for professional pedagogical activity within information educational environment. Smart Education and Smart e-Learning. Smart Innovation, System and Technologies. 41, 333–343. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-19875-0_30.

22. Krupich V.I. (1995) Teoreticheskie osnovy obucheniya resheniyu shkol'nyh matematicheskikh zadach [Theoretical bases of teaching the solution of school mathematical problems] Moscow, Prometey Publ. (In Russian).

23.  Semenova I.N., Novoselov S.A. (2015) The diagnostics of well-formed ability of students and teachers to make and to evaluate the system of modern methods of teaching mathematics. Smart Education and Smart e-Learning. Smart Innovation, System and Technologies. 41, 345–355. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-19875-0_31.