Introduction. The analysis showed that the young schoolchildren’s self-regulation process is not sufficiently formed, and the problem is to create and conduct appropriate formative programs. The purpose of the research is to make and conduct a forming program for managing the process of self-regulation among junior schoolchildren.

Materials and methods. The study was conducted in Chelyabinsk secondary school № 154 in three stages (preparatory, diagnostic-forming, analytical). Empirical (ascertaining and forming experiments, external observation, testing) and statistical-mathematical methods (calculation of the Wilcoxon T-test) and two methods of A.I. Vysotskij and B.N. Phillips were used: “The method of observation for the evaluation of strong-willed qualities” and “Diagnosis of the level of school anxiety”.

Results. Based on the analysis of junior schoolchildren’s self-regulation process, the formative program has been compiled and its implementation made it possible to reveal the features of formation the younger schoolchildren’s abilities to master themselves and their behavior.

Discussion. The realization of this program is influenced on the formation of abilities to master oneself and one’s behavior on the basis of intellectual, reasonable actions (self-regulation in intellectual activity); emotionally respond to the situations in a socially acceptable way (emotional self-regulation), and also manage actions and behavior in different situations (volitional self-regulation). Separately taken aspects of self-regulation are studied by native and foreign authors. The novelty of the research presented in the article is the implementation of systemic and integrated approaches in total.

Conclusion. The analysis of junior schoolchildren’s self-regulation process is revealed the need for compiling and implementing a formative program for managing the process of children’s self-regulation. In the process of creating such a program, it is necessary to take into account the peculiarities of the formation of younger schoolchildren’s abilities to master themselves and their behavior and to make appropriate psychological and pedagogical recommendations only on this basis.

• The analysis of younger schoolchildren’s self-regulation process has been conducted;
• The forming program for managing the younger schoolchildren’s self-regulation process has been compiled and implemented;
• Features of forming abilities of younger schoolchildren to master themselves and their behavior have been revealed.

1. Bicharova M.M., Lebedeva I.V., Topchiev M.S. (2017) Childfree in Russia: motivations and social conflicts. Man in India. 97(7), 23–33.

2. Babunova Y.S., Gradusovas L.V., Pustovoytova O.V., Shepilova N.A. (2017) Psychological and pedagogical support in positive socialization of preschool children. Espacios. 38 (55), 11. Available from: http://www.revistaespacios.com/a17v38n55/17385511.html (Accessed 13th May 2018).

3. Volkova O.A., Besschetnova O.V. (2015) Social adaptation features of children in foster care. European Journal of Science and Theology. 11(3), 89–96.

4. Shagaeva N.A. (2015) The formation of moral values in junior schoolchildren during the study of ethno-cultural traditions. European Journal of Science and Theology. 3(3), 175-181.

5. Kondrashova E.N., Rashchikulina E.N., Isaeva I.Yu., Plugina N.A., Suprun N.G. (2017) Methodology for local history. Man in India. 97(10), 373–398.

6. Sur’yaninova T.I., Smirnov N.V. (2017) Osobennosti sovmestnoj deyatel’nosti mladshih shkol’nikov [Features of joint activity of younger schoolchildren] Questions of psychology. 2, 58–66. (In Russian).

7. Grebenkin E.V., Habberger V. (2017) Osobennosti konfliktnogo povedeniya mladshih shkol’nikov i shkol’nikov podrostkovogo vozrasta: vzglyad iz Rossii i Germanii [Features of younger schoolchildren and schoolchildren of adolescence’s conflict behavior: a view from Russia and Germany] Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Vol. 5(1), 16–24. Available from: http://vestnik.nspu.ru/article/39 (Accessed 13th May 2018). (In Russian).

8. Dudina M.N., Dolgova V.I. (2016) New educational paradigm: existentialism is a humanism. Man in India. 96 (10). 4043–4050.

9. Shilov S.N., Soldatova O.G., Nalivajko N.D. (2014) Temperamental’nye cherty lichnosti rebenka, kak faktor, opredelyayushchij rezerv zdorov’ya [Temperamental features of child’s personality as a factor determining the health reserve] Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. 1, 89–100. Available from:  http://vestnik.nspu.ru/article/596 (Accessed 13th May 2018). (In Russian).

10. Leont’ev D.A., Lebedeva A.A., Kostenko V.Yu. (2017) Traektorii lichnostnogo razvitiya: rekonstrukciya vzglyadov L.S. Vygotskogo [Trajectories of personal development: reconstruction of the views of LS Vygotsky] Voprosy obrazovaniya. 2, 98–112. DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2017-2-98-112. (In Russian).

11. Wagner N.A. (2012) Uspeshnost’ uchenika nachal’noj shkoly v usloviyah differencirovannogo obrazovaniya [The success of the pupil in primary school in conditions of differentiated education] Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Vol.7(3), 18–23. Available from: http://vestnik.nspu.ru/article/196 (Accessed 13th May 2018). (In Russian).

12. Lyubimov L.L. (2017) Kniga, v kotoroj nuzhdaetsya kazhdaya shkola. Recenziya na knigu: A.A. Leont’ev. Pedagogika zdravogo smysla. Izbrannye raboty po filosofii obrazovaniya i pedagogicheskoj psihologii [The book that every school needs. Book review: A.A. Leontiev. Pedagogy of common sense. Selected works on the philosophy of education and pedagogical psychology] Ed. Leont’ev D.A. Voprosy obrazovaniya. 3, 234–241. DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2017-3-234-241. (In Russian).

13. Dolgova V.I., Mamylina N.V., Belousova N. A., Melnik E.V., Arkayeva N.I. (2016) Problems of mental regulation of personal behavior. Man in India. 96 (10), 3485–3491. Available from:http://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27587974.

14. Dudina M.N., Dolgova V.I. (2016) The Crisis of Upbringing in the Contemporary Chronotope: potential solutions. Man in India. 96 (10). 3503–3511.

15. Abe J.A.A. (2011) Positive emotions, emotional intelligence, and successful experiential learning. Personality and Individual Differences. 51(7), 817–822. DOI:  0.1016/j.paid.2011.07.004

16. Krivenko M.P. (2014) Sravnitel’nyj analiz procedur regressionnogo analiza [Comparative analysis of regression analysis procedures] Informatics and its applications. Vol.8 (3), 70–78. DOI: 10. 14357 / 19922264140308. (In Russian).

17. Zabrodin Yu.M., Pahal’yan V.Eh. (2015) Psihodiagnostika [Psychodiagnostics] Saratov, University education Publ. (In Russian).

18. Bakhchina A.V., Polevaya S.A., Parin S.B. (2013) Vegetative correlates of cognitive processes in stress situation. European Scientific Journal. 3, 277–280. Available from: http://eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/view/2436/2309.

19. Boyatzis R.E., Smith M.L., Van Oosten E., Woolford L. (2013) Developing resonant leaders through emotional intelligence, vision and coaching. Organizational Dynamics. 42 (1), 17–24. DOI: 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2012.12.003.

20. Harant M. (2016) Der Inkingsbegriff im Spannungsfeld pдdagogischer ‘Mindsets’. Pдdagogische Korrespondenz. 54, 37–57. Available from:  http://www.budrich-journals.de/index.php/pk/issue/view/1915

21. Kronauer M. (2015) Wer Inklusion mцchte, darf ьber Exklusion nicht schweigen. Plдdoyer fьr eine Erweiterung der Debatte. Jahrbuch fьr Pдdagogik. 2015(1), 147–158. DOI: 10.3726/267059_147.

22. Stichweh R. (2013) Inklusion and Exemption in der Weltgesellschaft - am Beispiel der Schule und des Erziehungssystems. Zeitschrift fьr Inklusion. 1, 22. Available from: https://www.inklusion-online.net/index.php/inklusion-online/article/view/22.