E-mail: Send an e-mail
Introduction. The article examines the problem of personal meaning in the digital environment and their relationship with life-meaning orientations in the real environment. An analysis of the results of a study of the dominant digital meanings of respondents with a high level of activity in the digital environment is proposed. The research was carried out in three stages. At the first stage, respondents with a high level of digital activity were identified according to a number of diagnostic criteria. At the second stage, using the focus group method, the main digital meanings of the respondents were determined. At the third stage, a correlation analysis was carried out.
Materials and Methods. The main research methods are analysis of literature on the research topic; analysis of user self-reports to identify respondents with a high level of digital activity; focus group method to identify the main digital meanings of users; methodology for studying life-meaning orientations authored by D.A. Leontyev.
Results. Reliable results have been obtained from a study of the digital meanings of users with a high level of digital activity. It was revealed that respondents with a high level of digital activity are more likely to have such digital meanings as mastery of space, creativity, compensation for problems in com-
munication, changing role position, communication, development, recreation, search for life guidelines and self-presentation. These meanings influence the direction of a person’s behavior in the digital environment.
Discussion. The study determined the relationship between the digital meanings of a person and his life-meaning orientations in the real environment. It has been determined that with a decrease in the orientation of the individual towards the goal and result in the real environment, digital meaning increases according to the type of possession of space in the digital environment. The obtained data on the relationship of indicators made it possible to determine the need for further research and the formation of a system of psychological support for respondents with non-adaptive individual psychological characteristics.
Conclusion. The study identified a group of respondents with a high level of digital activity and clarified its main characteristics. The main digital meanings of respondents in the selected group when interacting with the digital environment have been established. The relationship between the digital meanings of a person and his life-meaning orientations in a real environment has been studied. The main ways of developing a person’s digital meanings are identified, including compensation for social actions in the digital environment and the formation of meanings under the influence of digital resources.
Digital environment; Digital user; Digital meanings; Life meaning orientations; Digital activity
The behavior of an individual in the digital environment can be mediated by its individual psychological characteristics and a set of digital meanings;
There is a relationship between the user’s digital meanings and his life-meaning orientations in real space.
1. Anchukova N.I. & Vasilenko K.O. (2021), Cifrovaya sreda kak faktor formirovaniya zhiznennoj pozicii lichnostiv sovremennyh social'no-ekonomicheskih usloviyah [The digital environment as a factor in the formation of a person's life position in modern socio-economic conditions], Social'nye i gumanitarnye nauki na Dal'nem Vostoke, 4, 134–139. DOI 10.31079/1992-2868-2021-18-4-134-139. EDN: KASRDH. (In Russian).
2. Len'kov R.V., Kolosova O.A. & Kovaleva S. V. (2021), Social'no-psihologicheskaya diagnostika i prognozirovanie protestnogo povedeniya molodezhi v cifrovoj srede [Socio-psychological diagnostics and forecasting of youth protest behavior in the digital environment], Cifrovaya sociologiya, 1 (4), 31–41. DOI 10.26425/2658-347X-2021-4-1-31-41. EDN: YQQGVH. (In Russian).
3. Dedov N. P., Komissarova O. A., Kokhova I. V. & Petrunya O.E. (2023), Psihologicheskie osobennosti ispol'zovaniya cifrovyh tekhnologij v obrazovatel'noj deyatel'nosti [Psychological features of the use of digital technologies in educational activities], Vestnik evrazijskoj nauki, 1 (15), 1–9. EDN: VNTQQH. (In Russian).
4. Tishkova A.S (2020), Osobennosti cifrovoj socializacii sovremennoj molodezhi: teoreticheskij ekskurs [Features of digital socialization of modern youth: a theoretical digression], Chelovecheskij kapital, 12 (180), 212–218. DOI 10.25629/HC.2023.12.19. EDN: OFXNHN. (In Russian).
5. Sari A. I. (2020), “Digital learning, smartphone usage, and digital culture in Indonesia education”, Integration of Education, no. 1 (24), pp. 20–31.
6. Flerov O. V. & Kutaitseva O. N. (2023), Cifrovoe povedenie kak psihologo-pedagogicheskij fenomen (strukturno-soderzhatel'nyj analiz) [Digital behavior as a psychological and pedagogical phenomenon (structural and content analysis)], Obrazovatel'nye resursy i tekhnologii, 1(42), 51–61. DOI 10.21777/2500-2112-2023-1-51-61. EDN: TMMZVE. (In Russian).
7. Soldatova G.U. & Rasskazova E.I. (2017), Motivaciya v strukture cifrovoj kompetentnosti rossijskih podrostkov [Motivation in the structure of the digital competence of Russian adolescents], Natsional’nyy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal, 1, 3–14. DOI 10.11621/npj.2017.0101. EDN: YJMQLH. (In Russian).
8. Panov V. I. & Patrakov E. V. (2020), Interferenciya cifrovoj i docifrovoj sred kak predmet psihologicheskogo issledovaniya [Interference of digital and pre-digital environments as a subject of psychological research], Gercenovskie chteniya: psihologicheskie issledovaniya v obrazovanii, 3, 531–541. DOI 10.33910/herzenpsyconf-2020-3-56. EDN: VJTSMH. (In Russian).
9. Bajguzhin P. A., Shibkova D. Z. & Ajzman R. I. (2019), Faktory, vliyayushchie na psihofiziologicheskie processy vospriyatiya informacii v usloviyah informatizacii obrazovatel'noj sredy [Factors influencing the psychophysiological processes of information perception in the conditions of informatization of the educational environment], Science for Education Today, 5(9),48–69. DOI 10.15293/2658-6762.1905.04. EDN: VOOJCL. (ERIH PLUS). (In Russian).
10. Osin E. N. & Kosheleva N. V. (2020), Test smyslozhiznennyh orientacij: novye dannye o strukture i validnosti [The test of life orientations: new data on structure and validity], Voprosy psihologii, 6(66), 151–163. EDN: JERMWS. (Scopus, WoS). (In Russian).

