Herald SUrSHPU
The Herald of South-Ural state Humanities-Pedagogical University ЧГПУ

ISSN: 2618–9682; ISSN 1997-9886
Impact factor RSCI: 0,312

BACK TO ISSUE CONTENT | HERALD OF CSPU 2018 № 4 Review articles
SHOW FULL TEXT (IN RUSSIAN)
DOI: 10.25588/CSPU.2018.82..4..019
UDC: 159.9.015
BBC: 88.3
Lydia Sergeevna Rychkova ORCID
Academic Title of Professor, Southern Ural State University (National Research University), Professor of the Department of General Psychology, Psychodiagnostics of Psychological Counseling
E-mail: Send an e-mail
Maria Nikolaevna Kuznetsova ORCID
Southern Ural State University (National Research University), the post-graduate student of the department of general psychology, psychodiagnostics psychological counseling
E-mail: Send an e-mail
APPROACHES TO UNDERSTANDING DESTRUCTIVE BEHAVIOR IN RUSSIAN AND FOREIGN PSYCHOLOGY
Abstracts

Introduction. The article emphasizes the importance of studying the psychology of destructive human behavior in the economic crisis. The concepts of “destructiveness” and “destructive behavior” are considered. The article presents the theoretical analysis of scientific approaches (genetic and socio-cultural) to understand destructive behavior in foreign and national psychology in the works of C. Lombroso, Freud, E. Kretschmer, W. Sheldon, K. Lorenz, E. Durkheim, R. Merton, E. Frome, S.L. Rubinstein, L.S. Vygotsky, A.N. Leontiev, V.N. Myasishchev, B.V. Zeigarnik, T.P. Korolenko, T.A. Donskikh, V.I. Lysak, A. Kleiberg.

The article substantiates the relevance of destructive human behavior. An analytical review of the main ideas of foreign and domestic scientists and modern researchers is presented. The purpose of the article is to study the scientific approaches to understanding the destructive behavior of the individual in foreign and domestic psychology.

Results and discussion. Investigated and disclosed some of the major approaches to understanding destructive behavior of the individual in foreign and domestic psychology. The concepts of the psychology of destructiveness are considered.

Conclusion. Existing theories of human destructiveness can be divided into two groups. The first group includes the works of scientists who have studied hereditary and biological factors of destructiveness. The second group includes studies of the socio-cultural factor of destructive behavior.

Keywords

destructions, destructiveness, destructive behavior, destructive behavior, approaches to destructive behavior

Highlights

• the importance of studying destructive human behavior in the conditions of economic crisis is determined;

• reveals the concept of “destructive” and “destructive behavior” by different authors, investigate the problem;

• some scientific approaches to understanding destructive behavior in foreign and domestic psychology are analyzed

REFERENCES

1. Kleyberg, Y.A. (2004) Sotsial’naya psikhologiya deviantnogo povedeniya [Social Psychology of Deviant Behavior]. M.: FLINTA, 232 p. (in Russian).

2. Kleyberg, Y.A. Tipologiya destruktivnogo povedeniya [Typology of destructive behavior] the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia.  2008. With. 130–135 (in Russian).

3. Afanas’yev, V.S., Gilinskiy YA.I. Deviantnoye povedeniye i sotsial’nyy kontrol’ v usloviyakh krizisa rossiyskogo obshchestva [Deviant behavior and social control in a crisis of Russian society]. St. Petersburg: Institute of Sociology. RAS, 1995.  198 p. (in Russian).

4. Mendelevich V.D. Psikhologiya deviantnogo povedeniya [Psychology of Deviant Behavior]. St. Petersburg.: Speech, 2005. 221 p. (in Russian).

5. Rychkova L.S. Psikhologiya otklonyayushchegosya povedeniya [Psychology of deviant behavior]. Chelyabinsk: SUSU, 2013.  134 p. (in Russian).

6. Kulikov V.B., Zlokazov K.V. Destruktivnoye povedeniye: teoretiko-metodologicheskiy aspekt [Destructive behavior: theoretical and methodological aspect]. Psychopedagogy in law enforcement agencies.  2006.  No. 3. P. 89–92 (in Russian).

7. Bogdan, S.S. Ekzistentsional’no-gumanisticheskiy podkhod k probleme chelovecheskoy destruktivnosti [Existional-humanistic approach to the problem of human destructiveness]. System of values of modern society.  2010. № 16. P. 42–46 (in Russian).

8. Korolenko T.P., Donskikh T.A. Sem’ putey k katastrofe [Seven ways to disaster].  Novosibirsk: Science, 1990.  222 p. (in Russian).

9. Lombrozo C.H. Prestupnyy chelovek [The criminal man]. Per. s ital. G. I. Gordona. М.: Eksmo; SPb.: Midgard, 2005.  876 p. (in Russian).

10. Freud S. Vvedeniye v psikhoanaliz [Introduction to Psychoanalysis] / St. Petersburg.: Aleteya, 1989.  364 p. (in Russian).

11. Krechmer E. Stroyeniye tela i kharakter [The structure of the body and character]. Per. s nem. G.Y. Tartakovskogo; Pod red. P.B. Gannushkina.  M.: Akademicheskiy proyekt, 2015.  327 p. (in Russian).

12. William H. Sheldon, The varieties of human physique: An introduction to constitutional psychology (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1940).

13. Lorents K. Tak nazyvayemoye zlo. K yestestvenno teorii agressii [The so-called evil. To the natural theory of aggression]. trans. A.I. Feta. – M.: Republic, 1998. – 242 p. (in Russian).

14. Lysak I.V. Chelovek – razrushitel': destrutkivnaya deyatel'nost' cheloveka kak sotsiokul'turnyy fenomen [Human destructive: the destructive activity of man as a socio-cultural phenomenon]. Taganrog: TRSTU, 1999.  160 p. (in Russian).

15. Lysak I.V. Filosofsko-antropologicheskiy analiz destruktivnoy deyatel'nosti sovremennogo cheloveka [Philosophical-Anthropological Analysis of the Destructive Activity of Modern Man]. Rostov-on-Don – Taganrog: SKNTS VS, TRTU, 2004. 160 p. (in Russian).

16. Kudryavtsev V.N. Sotsial'noye i biologicheskoye v antiobshchestvennom povedenii [Social and biological in antisocial behavior] // Biological and social in human development.  1977.  P. 152–158 (in Russian).

17. Dyurkgeym E. Samoubiystvo: Sotsial'nyy etyud [Social Etude]. M.: Thought, 1994. 399 p.
(in Russian).

18. Merton R. Sotsial’naya teoriya i sotsial’naya struktura [Social theory and social structure]. Socis.  1992.   № 2.  P. 118–121 (in Russian).

19. Fromm E. Anatomiya chelovecheskoy destruktivnosti [Anatomy of human destructiveness]: monograph. E. Fromm.   M.: Republic, 1994. 447 p. (in Russian).

20. Rubinshteyn S.L. Printsipy i puti razvitiya psikhologii [Principles and ways of development of psychology]: monograph. M.: Nauka,  1997.  456 p. (in Russian).

21. Vygotskiy L.S. Istoriya razvitiya vysshikh psikhicheskikh funktsiy [History of development of higher mental functions]. Vygotsky LS Sobr.soch. M.: Sense; Eksmo, 2005.   T. 3.  P.  5–328 (in Russian).

22. Leont’yev A.N. Problemy razvitiya psikhiki [Problems of development of the psyche]. M.: Academy of pedagogical sciences of the RSFSR, 1959.  345 p. (in Russian).

23. Zabelina E.V., Chestyunina Yu.V., Trushina I.A., Vedeneyeva E.V. (2018) Time Perspective as a Predictor of Procrastination. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. Volume 238, P. 87–93. doi.org/10.1016/ j.sbspro.2018.03.011

24 .Zeygarnik B.V. K voprosu o mekhanizmakh razvitiya lichnosti [On the question of the mechanisms of personality development]. Vestn. Moscow. University. Ser. 14. Psychology, 1979, No. 1. Р. 3–8 (in Russian).

25. Stolbun V.D., Strel'tsova V.P. Filosofsko-psikhologicheskiye vozzreniya V.N. Myasishcheva [Philosophical and psychological views VN. Myasishcheva]. Research materials on the history of Russian psychology, vol.1, 1999, p. 9–17 (in Russian).

26. Volkova Y.A. Prostranstvennoye povedeniye kommunikatov v destruktivnom obshchenii [Spatial behavior of communicants in destructive communication]. Philological Sciences. Questions of theory and practice.   2013.   No. 8 (26).  P. 46–50 (in Russian).

27. Kuznetsova M.N. Obzor teoreticheskikh aspektov destruktivnogo povedeniya lichnosti [A review of theoretical aspects of destructive behavior of an individual]. Scientific notes of the University named after P.F. Lesgaft.  2018. No. 2 (156).  P. 340–343 (in Russian).

28. Kuznetsova M.N. K voprosu o trevozhnykh rasstroystvakh i destruktivnom povedenii u podrostkov [On the issue of anxiety disorders and destructive behavior in adolescents]. Bulletin of the Council of Young Scientists and Specialists of the Chelyabinsk Region.  2016.  T. 4. № 4(15).  P. 73–79 (in Russian).