E-mail: Send an e-mail
Introduction. Effective training of future mathematics teachers in finding methods for solving mathematical problems is impossible without timely and objective diagnosis of its process and results. The aim of the study is to create a diagnostic model that adequately reflects the formation of methods for finding solutions to mathematical problems in future bachelors of pedagogical education.
Materials and methods. The development of the diagnostic model is based on the comparison of the Professional Standard of the Teacher and the Federal State Educational Standard of Higher Education. The test system of tasks for diagnostics of competence formation at the level of knowledge and skills and creative tasks for diagnostics at the level of possession of labor actions is described.
Results. To obtain a generalized assessment of competence formation, a linear diagnostic model based on regression analysis was constructed. To create it, the results of each student at the levels of knowledge, skills and possession (the percentage of correctly performed tasks) were compared with the average expert assessment given by the teachers of the university and mathematics teachers during the practice of students.
Discussion. The analysis allows to draw a conclusion about the need to bring the standard of higher education in line with the Professional standard of the teacher. Comparison of the constructed linear model with earlier obtained models of diagnostics testifies to its adequacy.
Conclusion. The constructed diagnostic system meets the requirements of the Professional standard of the teacher and the federal state educational standard of higher education in the direction of «Pedagogical Education» and can serve to diagnose both the formation of competences and the mastery of methods for finding solutions to problems.
diagnostics, diagnostic model, methods for finding solutions to mathematical problems, Professional teacher standard, competence
• it was revealed that the federal state educational standard of higher education in the direction of 44.03.05 The pedagogical education does not fully correspond to the Professional Standard of the teacher in the field of the mathematics teacher training;
•developed a model of diagnostics that corresponds to the Professional Standard of the teacher and allows to objectively evaluate the formation of methods for finding solutions to problems in future mathematics teachers;
•shows the implementation of the diagnostic model of methods for finding solutions to problems in the practice of teaching students-mathematicians
1. Polya D. Mathematical Discovery: On Understanding, Learning and Teaching Problem Solving. New York – London, John Wiley & Sons, 1965. 216 p.
2. Polya D. How to Solve It. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2014. 288 p.
3. Polya D. Mathematics and Plausible Reasoning. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1954. 280 p.
4. Balk M.B., Balk G.D. O privitii shkol’nikam ehvristicheskogo myshleniya [On inculcating heuristic thinking to schoolchildren]. Matematika v shkole, 1985, no. 2. Р. 55–60 (in Russian).
5. Demchenkova N.A., Antonova I.V., Razuvaeva N.V. Formirovanie priemov ehvristicheskoj deyatel’nosti v processe obucheniya matematike uchashchihsya obshcheobrazovatel’noj shkoly [Formation of methods of heuristic activity in the process of teaching mathematics to pupils of the general education school]. Vektor nauki TGU. Seriya Pedagogika. Psihologiya, 2015, no. № 4 (23). Р. 66–73 (in Russian).
6. Izaak D.F. Poiski resheniya geometricheskoy zadachi [The search for the solution of the geometric problem]. Matematika v shkole, 1998, no. 6. Р. 30–34 (in Russian).
7. Semenov E.E. Razmyshleniya ob ehvristikah [Reflections on heuristics]. Matematika v shkole, 1995, no. 5, pp. 39–43 (in Russian).
8. Norqvist M. The effect of explanations on mathematical reasoning tasks. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 2018, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 15–30. DOI: 10.1080/0020739Х.2017.1340679
9. Jonsson B., Kulaksiz Y.C., Lithner J. Creative and algorithmic mathematical reasoning: effects of transfer-appropriate processing and effortful struggle. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 2016, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 1206-1225. DOI: 10.1080/0020739Х.2016.1192232
10. Tyagi T.K. Is there a causal relation between mathematical creativity and mathematical problem-solving performance? International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 2016, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 388-394. DOI: 10.1080/0020739Х.2015.1075612
11. Marks D. A Guide to More Sensible Word Problems. Mathematics Teacher, 1994, vol. 87, pp. 610–611.
12. Balk M.B., Balk, G.D. Poisk resheniya [Solution search]. Moscow, Det. lit. Publ., 1983. – 143 p. (in Russian).
13. Herr T., Jonson, K. Problem Solving Strategies: Crossing the River with Dogs and Other Mathematical Adventures. Berkeley, Key Curriculum Press, 1994. 486 p.
14. Sukhovienko E.A. Informacionnye tekhnologii pedagogicheskoj diagnostiki v obuchenii: teoriya i praktika [Information Technologies of Pedagogical Diagnosis in Teaching: Theory and Practice]. Chelyabinsk: Yuzhno-Ural’skoe Publ., 2005. 238 p. (in Russian).
15. Antonova A.V., Klimenko I.M. Professionalnyiy standart pedagoga: novyie trebovaniya i kvalifikatsionnyie harakteristiki sovremennogo uchitelya [Professional standard of the teacher: new requirements and qualification characteristics of the modern teacher]. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii, 2014, no. 6. Р. 81–86 (in Russian).
16. Dнaz V., Poblete A. A model of professional competences in mathematics to update mathematical and didactic knowledge of teachers. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 2017, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 702–714. DOI: 10.1080/0020739Х.2016.1267808
17. Sukhovienko E.A. Teoreticheskiye osnovy informatsionnykh tekhnologiy pedagogicheskoy diagnostiki [Theoretical bases of information technologies of pedagogical diagnostics]. Chelyabinsk: CGPU Publ., 2004. 212 p. (in Russian).
18. Sukhovienko E.A. Upravlenie kachestvom obrazovaniya i pedagogicheskaya diagnostika [Quality management of education and pedagogical diagnostics]. Professionalnoe obrazovanie. Stolitsa, 2003, no. 10, p. 11 (In Russian).
19. Singh B. The development of tests to measure mathematical creativity. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 1987, vol. 18, no. 2, Р. 181–186. DOI: 10.1080/0020739870180203
20. Цzdemir B.G., Erdem E., Цrnek T., Soylu Y. Are middle school mathematics teachers able to solve word problems without using variable? International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 2018, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 85-106. DOI: 10.1080/0020739Х.2017.1349942
21. Suhovienko E.A. Matematicheskaya model reytingovoy sistemyi diagnostiki kompetentsiy buduschih uchiteley matematiki [Mathematical model of rating system of competence diagnostics of future mathematics teachers]. Aktualnyie problemyi razvitiya srednego i vyisshego obrazovaniya. Mejvuzovskiy sbornik nauchnyih trudov [Actual problems of development of secondary and higher education: ХI Interuniversity Sat. sci. works]. Chelyabinsk, 2015, Р. 92–98 (in Russian).