E-mail: Send an e-mail
E-mail: Send an e-mail
Introduction. The article substantiates the actualization of project activities, in particular on the basis of psychological, pedagogical and methodological effects, expressed in the formation of metasubject educational results - universal educational activities. It is emphasized that the increase in competitions of projects (participants) latently triggers the problem of spreading and fixing «system errors» and mixing the method of projects and research work. In order to improve the effectiveness of the project activities of students, recommendations on the selection of criteria for evaluating project preparation and protection procedures are provided.
The purpose of the article is to develop and propose the content of the stages of the project activities of students and criteria for evaluating the procedures for preparing and protecting the project.
Materials and methods. The article presents a theoretical analysis of scientific and methodological works (historical, theoretical, practical aspects of project activities); author's interpretation of the methodical approach to expert assessment of the results of the preparation and protection of the project.
Results and its discussion. The authors differentiate the concepts of «project», «project activity» and «research activity». The structure and content of the project activity with the regulated functions of the project author and his manager have been developed; criteria for evaluating the project as a means of achieving metadisciplinary universal learning activities. The problem of the distribution and fixation of «system errors» in the preparation of the results of project activities is discussed. It is assumed that one of the causes of «system errors» is the lack of integration of thinking by the authors of the project and the insufficient development of professional competences in the field of project and research activities of the project manager.
Conclusion. The developed content of the stages of the project activities of students and the criteria for evaluating the procedures for preparing and protecting the project are of a recommendatory nature. The authors are counting on constructive criticism and are invited to discuss this topic.
project, project activity, research activity, assessment criteria, students
– analysis of approaches to evaluating the results of project activities;
– identifies the causes of «system errors» in the organization and implementation of the stages of project activities;
– criteria for evaluating the actions of students in accordance with the stages of the project activity have been developed.
1. Аnokhina G.M., Dubovitskaya T.V., Lukina E.А., Savinkov YU.А. (2014) Tekhnologiya razvitiya lichnosti i universal'nykh uchebnykh dejstvij v obshheobrazovatel'noj shkole [Technology of personal development and universal educational activities in secondary
school]. Innovatsii v obrazovanii. 7, 5–10. (In Russian).2. Gerasimova, E. Savvina O, Telkova V., Melnikov R., Trofimova E. (2015) Theoretical and Empirical Aspects of Project Activity at Modern Russian School. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 214, 27–33. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.589.
3. Chechel' I.D. (2011) Metod proektov, ili popytka izbavit' uchitelya ot obyazannostej vseznayushhego orakula [Method projects, or an attempt to save the teacher from the duties of the all-knowing oracle]. Direktor shkoly. 3, 10. (In Russian).
4. Supadol P., Sukreeyapong W., Intarakumhaeng P., Siripan K., Nesusin N. (2014) Results of learning activities of grade 1 thai language subjects using the project-based approach. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 116, 1444–1448. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.413.
5. Chou D.C. (2018) Applying design thinking method to social entrepreneurship project. Computer Standards & Interfaces. 55, 73–79. DOI: 10.1016/j.csi.2017.05.001.
6. Zhylkybay G., Magzhan S., Suinzhanova Z., Balaubekov M., Adiyeva P. (2014) The effectiveness of using the project method in the teaching process. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 143, 621–624. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.448.
7. Krotova E.А., Maksheeva А. I. (2016) Proektnoe obuchenie kak sredstvo razvitiya tvorcheskoj deyatel'nosti [Project training as a means of developing creative activity] Sovremennye naukoemkie tekhnologii. 1–1, 120–123. (In Russian).
8. Polat E.C. (2006) Metod proektov: istoriya i teoriya voprosa [Project method: history and theory of the question]. Shkol'nye tekhnologii. 6, 43–47. (In Russian).
9. Kazarova O.А., Nikolaeva T.V. (2014) Аdaptatsii-innovatsii v proektnoj deyatel'nosti: podkhody k klassifikatsii proektov [Adaptation-innovation in project activities: approaches to the classification of projects]. V mire nauchnykh otkrytij: Materialy XII Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferentsii. 46–53. (In Russian).
10. Nagel' O.I. (2014) Problema otsenki proektnoj deyatel'nosti obuchayushhikhsya [The problem of evaluating the project activities of students]. Izvestiya АSOU. Nauchnyj ezhegodnik. 1 (2). 202–211. (In Russian).
11. Ivasiv O.V. (2017) Problemy ehkspertnogo otsenivaniya proektnoj deyatel'nosti v obshheobrazovatel'nom uchebnom zavedenii [Problems of expert evaluation of project activities in a general education institution]. Аktual'nye nauchnye issledovaniya v sovremennom mire. 2–6 (22), 100–106. (in Ukrainian).
12. Kazarova O.А., Pchyolina E.А. (2017) Аdaptivno-innovatsionnye metody i instrumenty otsenivaniya individual'nykh proektov po biologii [Adaptive-innovative methods and tools for evaluating individual biology projects]. Biologiya v shkole. 4, 27–33. (In Russian).
13. Yakovleva I.А., Istomina E.А. (2016) Organizatsiya i kriterii otsenki proektnoj i uchebno-issledovatel'skoj deyatel'nosti [Organization and criteria for evaluating project and teaching and research activities]. Obrazovanie: resursy razvitiya. Vestnik LOIRO. 4, 75–80. (In Russian).
14. Shibkova D.Z., Baiguzhin P. А. (2018) Social'nyj proekt po osnovam bezopasnosti
zhiznedeyatel'nosti: O tom, chto my malo cenim, no za chto dorogo platim. [Social project on the basics of life safety: the fact that we value little, but for what we pay dearly]. Proc. Individual projects for students of the 7–9th grade. Sbornik rabot «Individual'nye proekty dlya obuchayushhikhsya 7-9-kh klassov». Chelyabinsk, Izd-vo YUUrGGPU. 213–220. (In Russian).
15. Shibkova D. Z. (2016) Metodicheskie rekomendacii k organizacii i provedeniyu interaktivnyh zanyatij «Neuroki» po teme «Nauka byt' zdorovym». [Guidelines for the organization and conduct of interactive classes «Neuroki» on the topic «The science of being healthy». Proc. VI international scientific and practical conference «Adaptation of biological systems to natural and extreme environmental factors»]. Materialy VI Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferentsii «Аdapatsiya biologicheskikh sistem k estestvennym i ehkstremal'nym faktoram sredy». Chelyabinsk, Izd-vo YUUrGGPU. 458–460 (In Russian).