Herald
South Ural State Humanitarian Pedagogical University bulletin ЧГПУ

ISSN: 2618–9682
Impact factor RSCI: 0.236

BACK TO ISSUE CONTENT | HERALD OF CSPU 1 № Психологические науки Review papers
SHOW FULL TEXT (IN RUSSIAN)
SHOW IN eLibrary
DOI: 10.25588/CSPU.2018.03.24
UDC: 151.8
BBC: 88.37
N.V. Markina ORCID
Candidate of Sciences (Psychology), leading research scientist at the Laboratory of Research and Methodological Support of Gifted Children, Chelyabinsk Institute of Teachers’ Additional and Advanced Training, Chelyabinsk, Russia
E-mail: Send an e-mail
Modern research choices in the context of psychology of giftedness development: classical paradigm
Abstracts

The study substantiates the relevance of access to the possibility of existential psychology in solving the practical problems of modern education. The aim is to present the results of modern psychological research choices review in terms of identifying the theoretical basis of creating programs for developing gifted children.

Review structure: from the psychology of decision-making (including different spheres of activity) to the study of choice in the context of professional definition, and further, to the study of choice in the context of personal self-determination. The author selected psychological researches for analysis which were made in terms of the classical scientific paradigm.

The author suggests the possibility to correlate criteria of subjective quality of choice and psychological criteria for the choice of profile training. It has been emphasized the group of phenomena whose usage would expand the phenomenology of giftedness development (constructive personal reflection, system of vital meanings personal choice strategies, meaningful orientations, «fatefulness» and «daily life of elections», choice of creative way and etc.).

The paper reveals the subject matter of poor knowledge about existential and psychological problems of giftedness. The results of the research demonstrate that the strategies for professional and personal self-determination can serve as a guide for creating programs for the development of gifted children.

Keywords

psychology of giftedness, classical paradigm, personal choice, making decisions, professional self-determination, personal self-determination

Highlights
  • Modern aspects of studying personal choice in terms of creation the educational models of support and development of gifted children have been specified;
  • Review results of modern researches about ration of choice and decision-making, professional and personal self-determination in terms of classical paradigm have been demonstrated;
  • Poor knowledge about personal choice problems in the psychology of giftedness and pedagogical psychology has been revealed.
REFERENCES
  1. Matyushkin A.M. (1989) Koncepciya tvorcheskoj odaryonnosti [Concept of creative giftedness] Voprosy psihologii. 6, 29–33. (In Russian).
  2. Babaeva Yu. D., LejtesN.S., Maryutina T.M. and et al. (1996) Psihologiya odaryonnosti detej i podrostkov [Psychology of children and adolescents’ giftedness] Ed. N.S. Lejtes. Moscow, Akademiya Publ. (In Russian).
  3. Bogoyavlenskaya D.B., Shadrikov V.D., Brushlinskij A.V. (1998) Rabochaya koncepciya odaryonnosti [Working concept of giftedness] President. Programma «Deti Rossii».Moscow, Magistr Publ. (In Russian).
  4. Gryazeva V.G. (2000) Ehkologicheskay psihologiya tvorcheskoj lichnosti: Obuchenie v kontekste razvitiya lichnosti kak sub’’ekta kul’tury [Ecological psychology of the creative personality: Education in the context of the development of the personality as a subject of culture] Chelyabinsk, Poligraf-Master Publ. (In Russian).
  5. Kholodnaya M.A. (1997) Psihologiya intellekta: paradoksy issledovaniya [Psychology of intellect: paradoxes of research] Tomsk, Bars Publ. (In Russian).
  6. Savenkov A.I. (2000) Odaryonnye deti v detskom sadu I shkole [Gifted children in kindergarten and school] Moscow, Izdatel’skij center Akademiya Publ. (In Russian).
  7. d. Ushakov D.V. (1999) Psihologiya odaryonnosti: ot teorii k practice [Psychology of giftedness: from theory to practice] Moscow, IP RAN Publ. (In Russian).
  8. Larionova L.I. (2011) Kul'turno-psihologicheskie faktory razvitiya intellektual'noj odarennosti [Cultural and psychological factors of the development of intellectual giftedness] Moscow, Izd-vo IP RAN Publ. (In Russian).
  9. Druzhinin V.N., Hazratova N.V. (1994) Ehksperimental'noe issledovanie formiruyushchego vliyaniya mikrosredy na kreativnost' [Experimental study of the shaping effect of microenvironment on creativity] Psihologicheskij zhurnal. Vol. 15 (4), 83–93. (In Russian).
  10. Voronin A.N. (2004) Intellekt i kreativnost' v mezhlichnostnom vzaimodejstvii [Intellect and creativity in interpersonal interaction] Moscow, Izd-vo IP RAN Publ. (In Russian).
  11. May R. (1969) Love and Will. New York, W.W. Norton Publ.
  12. Maddi S.R. (1983) Existential Analysis. The encyclopedic dictionary of psychology. Eds R. Harre, R. Lamb. Oxford, Blackwell Publ.
  13. Frankl V. (1990) Chelovek v poiskah smysla: sbornik [Man in search of meaning] Eds Gozman L.Ya., Leont’ev D.A. Moscow, Progress Publ. (In Russian).
  14. Eds Leont’ev D.A., Schur V.G. (1997) Psihologiya s chelovecheskim licom: gumanisticheskaya perspektiva v postsovetskoj psihologii [Psychology with a human face: a humanistic perspective in post-Soviet psychology] Moscow, Smysml Publ. (In Russian).
  15. Fromm Eh. (2011) Begstvo ot svobody [Flight from freedom] Moscow, AST Publ. (In Russian).
  16. Mironenkova N.N. (2017) Ponyatie cennostno-smyslovogo vybora uchashchihsya [The concept of the value-semantic choice of students] Byulleten’ nauki i praktiki. 14.7, 273–278 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.546360. (In Russian).
  17. Leont’ev D.A. (2014) Psihologiya vybora. Chast' I. Za predelami racional'nosti [Psychology of choice. Part I. Beyond rationality] Psihologicheskij zhurnal. Vol. 35 (5), 5–18. (In Russian).
  18. Petrovskij V.A. (2006) Uroven' trudnosti zadachi: metaimplikativnaya model' motivacii vybora [Level of the task difficulty: a metamplicative motivation model of choice] Psihologicheskij zhurnal. Vol (27) 1, 6–23. (In Russian).
  19. Leont’ev D.A., Shelobanova D.A. (2001) Professional'noe samoopredelenie kak postroenie obrazov vozmozhnogo budushchego [Professional self-determination as the building of images of a possible future] Voprosy psihologii. 1, 57–66. (In Russian).
  20. Leont’ev D.A., Ovchinnikova E.Yu., Rasskazova E.I, Fam A.H. (2015) Psihologiya vybora [Psychology of choice] Moscow, Smysl Publ. (In Russian).
  21. Fam A.H., Leont’ev D.A. (2013) Sub”ektivnoe konstruirovanie vybora v situaciyah raznogo urovnya znachimosti (Chast’ 1) [Subjective construction of choice in situations of different significance level (part 1)] Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14, Psihologiya. 1, 84–96. (In Russian).
  22. Kornilova T.V. (2003) Psihologiya riska i prinyatiya reshenij [Psychology of risk and decision-making] Мoscow, Aspekt Press Publ. (In Russian).
  23. Kornilova T.V., Chumakova M.A., Kornilova S.A., Novikova M.A. (2010) Psihologiya neopredelennosti: edinstvo intellektual'no-lichnostnogo potenciala cheloveka [The psychology of uncertainty: the unity of the person's intellectual-personal potential] Moscow, Smysl Publ. (In Russian).
  24. Kornilova T.V., Chigrinova I.A. (2012) Stadii individual’noj morali i prinyatie neopredelennosti v regulyacii lichnostnyh vyborov [The stages of individual morality and the adoption of uncertainty in the regulation of personal elections] Psihologiya. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki. Vol. 33 (2), 69–87. (In Russian).
  25. Krasnov E.V., Chumakova M.A. (2014) Prediktory lichnostnogo vybora na materiale metodiki ehmocional'nogo predvoskhishcheniya [Predictors of personal choice on the basis of emotional anticipation method] Psihologiya. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki. Vol 11 (4), 37–55. (In Russian).
  26. Buldakova N.S. (2015) Prostranstvenno-vremennaya lokalizaciya mozgovyh struktur v processah prinyatiya reshenij [Spatial-temporal localization of brain structures in decision-making processes] Sovremennye problemy biofiziki, genetiki, ehlektroniki I priborostroeniya: II Vserosijskij seminar pamyati Yu.P. Volkova. 16–18 December 2015.Saratov, SGTU im. Yu.A. Gagarina,  15–19. (in Russian).
  27. Men’shikov I.S. (2014) Laboratornyj analiz vliyaniya konteksta na process prinyatiya reshenij [Laboratory analysis of the context influence on the decision-making process] Trudy MFTI. Vol. 6 (4), 67–77. (In Russian).
  28. Gavrilenko T.V., Ryabikina Z.N. (2017) Lichnostnye osobennosti sub”ekta samoregulyacii kak faktor, obuslavlivayushchij strategiyu samoorganizacii v situacii vybora [Personal features of the self-regulation subject as a factor that determines the strategy of self-organization in the situation of choice] Politematicheskij setevoj ehlektronnyj nauchnyj zhurnal Kubanskogo gosudarsvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. Vol.134, pp. 905–923 Available from: http://ej.kubagro.ru/2017/10/pdf/73.pdf (Accessed 15th May 2018). DOI: 10.21515/1990-4665-134-073. (In Russian).
  29. Ivanova L.V., SavchenkoT.V., Sochivko D.V. (2010) Modelirovanie funkcional’noj struktury lichnosti v situacii prinyatiya reshenij [Modeling the functional structure of the personality in the decision-making situation] Matematicheskaya psihologiya: shkola V.Yu. Krylova. Eds. Zhuravlyov A.L., Savchenko T.N., Golovina G.M. Moscow, Institut psihologii RAN Publ. (In Russian).
  30. Groshev I.V.. Zaguzova T.A. (2009) Osobennosti vybora komponentov struktury motiva pri prinyatii resheniya ot sovokupnosti lichnostnyh svojstv rukovoditelej – muzhchin i zhenshchin [Features of the choice of the motive structure components during deciding on the totality of the personal characteristics of the leaders - men and women] Voprosy sovremennoj nauki i praktiki. Universitet im. V.I. Vernadskogo. Vol.1 (15), 33–39. (In Russian).
  31. Morosanova V.I., Indina T.A. (2011) Regulyatornye i lichnostnye osnovy prinyatiya reshenij [Regulatory and personal decision-making bases] Moscow, Nestor-Istoriya Publ. (In Russian).
  32. Momdzhyan K.H. (2015) Process prinyatiya reshenij v deyatel'nosti lyudej [The decision-making process in people's activities] Ehlektronnoe nauchnoe izdanie Al’manah Prostranstvo I Vremya. Vol. 9. Available from: http://j-spacetime.com/actual%20content/t9v2/2227-9490e-aprovr_e-ast9-2.2015.32.php (Accessed 15th May 2018). (In Russian).
  33. Teslyuk P.V. (2016) Vliyanie urovnya intellekta, ehmocional’no-volevyh svojstv i sklonnosti k risku na process prinyatiya reshenij [Influence of the intelligence level, emotional-volitional properties and risk appetite on the decision-making process] Vestnik Universiteta grazhdanskoj zaschity MCHS Belarusi. 1. 23, 113–119. (In Russian).
  34. Shmakov A.V. (2014) Vozdejstvie faktora doveriya na process prinyatiya ehkonomicheskih reshenij [Influence of the trust factor on economic decision-making] Terra Economicus. Vol. 12 (3), 29–47. (In Russian).
  35. Saleem N., Hanan M.A., Salem I. Shanshad R.M. (2014) Career Selection: Role of Paren t’s Profession, Mass Media and Personal Choice. Bulletin of Education and Research December. Vol. 36 (2).
  36. Smith, Vicki J, Leeming, Dawn and Burr, Vivien (2016) Philosophy and Identity: The Relationship Between Choice of Existential Orientation and Therapists’ Sense of Self. Existential Analysis. 27. 2.
  37. Nikishin A.I., Rykman L.V. (2016) Psihologicheskaya gotovnost' k vyboru professii i lichnostnye harakteristiki starsheklassnikov s raznym urovnem osmyslennosti zhizni [Psychological readiness to choose a profession and personal characteristics of high school students with different level of meaningfulness of life] Nauchnye issledovaniya vypusknikov fakul’teta psihologii SPbGU. Vol. 4, 142–147. (In Russian).
  38. Urazaev K.F. (2014) Psihologicheskie osobennosti professional’nyh vyborov starsheklassnikov [Psychological features of professional elections for high school students] Nauka i sovremennost’. 27, 102–106. (In Russian).
  39. Yaschenko E.F., Menschikova I.A., Schelokova E.G., Postovalova A.I., Dunaeva O.N., Lazorak O.V., Saksonova Eh.V. (2016) Psihologiya samoaktualizacii i stanovleniya professionala v usloviyah sovremennogo obrazovaniya [Psychology of self-actualization and formation of a professional in the conditions of modern education] Saint Petersburg, EhLVI-Print Publ. (In Russian).
  40. Ed. Kronik A.A. (1993) LifeLine i drugie novye metody psihologii zhiznennogo puti [LifeLine and other new methods of life path psychology] Moscow, Progress, Kul’tura Publ. (In Russian).
  41. Karas’ D.V. (2010) Kategorial'noe prostranstvo internalizacii lichnostnogo vybora [Categorical space of internalization of personal choice] Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 331, 177–180. (In Russian).
  42. Kayasheva O.I. (2016) Fenomen lichnostnoj refleksii i osushchestvleniya svobodnogo vybora sub»ektom v trudnyh zhiznennyh situaciyah [The phenomenon of personal reflection and the exercise of free choice by the subject in difficult life situations] Vestnik Universiteta Rossijskoj akademii obrazovaniya. 1, 77–81. (In Russian).
  43. Shisheva A.G. (2008) Sistema zhiznennyh smyslov lichnosti kak psihologicheskoe uslovie vybora variantov zhizni v yunosheskom vozraste [System of vital meanings of personality as a psychological condition for choosing life options in adolescence] Izvestiya RGU im.A.I. Gercena. 67, 509–512. (In Russian).
  44. Fam A.H., Leont’ev D.A. (2013) Sub»ektivnoe konstruirovanie vybora v situaciyah raznogo urovnya znachimosti (okonchanie) [Subjective construction of choice in situations of different significance level (ending)] Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14. Psihologiya. 2, 93–105. (In Russian).
  45. Gryazeva-Dobshinskaya V.G., Mal’ceva A.S. (2016) «Tipologiya lichnostnogo zhiznennogo puti»: opisanie metodiki i rezul'taty psihometricheskoj proverki [«Typology of the personal life path»: a description of the methodology and the results of the psychometric test] Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Psihologiya. Vol. 9(2), 14–21. (In Russian).
  46. Raschupkina Yu.V. (2015) Processual’nye harakteristiki zhiznennyh vyborov molodyh lyudej v zavisimosti ot vyrazhennosti lichnostnoj zrelosti [Procedural characteristics of the young people’s life choices, depending on the severity of personal maturity] Psihologiya obrazovaniya v polikul’turnom prostranstve. 30. 2, 84–93. (In Russian).
  47. Dementij L.I., Magazeeva E.A. (2010) Lichnostnye osnovaniya strategij deyatel’nosti v situacii vybora [Personal foundations of activity strategies in the situation of choice] Lichnost’. Kul’tura. Obschestvo. 2. 55–56, 390–397. (In Russian).
  48. Petrovskij V.A. (2009) Sem' prostranstv sushchestvovaniya lichnosti: formal'nye modeli sostoyatel'nosti [Seven Spaces of Personal Existence: Formal Models of Solvency] Mir Psihologii. 1, 25–42. (In Russian).
  49. Ognev A.S., Gonchar S.N. (2013) Psihologicheskie mekhanizmy pozitivnogo razresheniya problem [Psychological mechanisms of positive problem solving] European social science journal. 11–2 (38), 291–301. (In Russian).
  50. Ognev A.S., Lihachyova Eh. V. (2014) Praktika vnedreniya pozitivno-orientirovannogo sub”ektogeneza v sistemu vysshego obrazovaniya [The practice of introducing positive-oriented subjectogenesis into the system of higher education] Psihologiya. Zhurnal vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki. Vol. 11 (2), 51–67. (In Russian).