Introduction. The article deals with transdisciplinary methods of quality assessment and training of future physical education teachers. The method of transdisciplinary supervision, “basket” method, methods of group reflexivity are presented.

Materials and methods. The main research methods are the analysis of scientific literature, conceptual analysis and systematization of approaches to solving the problem of quality management of training of future teachers of physical culture, modified questionnaire of V. I. Baydenko, content analysis.

Results. The importance of competencies for the Respondent (concentration, low priority, excessive stress, maintenance) and the level of achievement are highlighted as criteria for the effectiveness of using transdisci-disciplinary methods to assess the quality of training of future physical education teachers.

Discussion. Based on the conducted research, it is concluded that the process of quality management of training of future physical education teachers includes the creation of conditions for mastering the methods of action to effectively solve professional problems within the framework of a pedagogically oriented transdisciplinary worldview, which objectively reflect the method of transdisciplinary supervision and the “basket” method.

Conclusion. The results of the forming experiment show a change in the quality criteria for training future physical education teachers. Comparison of experimental groups shows statistically significant differences in the respondents ' views between EG-3 and EG-1, EG-2 with an error (p ≤ 0.05). Consequently, transdisciplinary methods of evaluating the quality of training of future physical education teachers transform the educational environment of a pedagogical University, in which innovation becomes a form of objective reality.

Transdisciplinary methods of evaluating the quality of training of future physical education teachers are highlighted;

The characteristic of transdisciplinary methods for assessing the quality of training of future physical education teachers is presented

Criteria for the effectiveness of methods for evaluating the quality of training of future physical education teachers are defined.

1. Mishchenko E.S. (2016), Prikladnyey aspekty system menedzhmenta kachestva v uchrezhdeniyach vyschego obrazovaniay [Applied aspects of quality management systems in higher education institutions]. Monografiya, Izdatel'stvo Tambovskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta, Tambov, 208 p. (In Russian).

2. Moky V.S. (2017), Metodologiya transdisstiplinarnosti-4 [Methodology of transdisciplinarity-4]. ANOITT, Nalchik, 112 p. (In Russian).

3. Gusakova M.A. (2015), Fenomen sub"ektnosti v teorii i praktike pedagogiki [The phenomenon of subjectivity in the theory and practice of pedagogy]. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii, 4, 90–95. (In Russian).

4. Mokiy M.S. & Nikiforov L.S. (2018), Metodologiya nauchnych isledovaniy (Uchebnik dlya magistratury) [Research Methodology (A Textbook for magistracy)]. Yurayt, Moscow, 255p. (In Russian).

5. Zhabakov, V.E. & Kuzmin, A.M. (2019), Upravlenie kachestvom podgotovki budushchih pedagogov fizicheskoj kultury v transdisciplinarnoj obrazovatelnoj srede [Quality management of training of future physical education teachers in a transdisciplinary educational environment]. Monografiya, Yuzhno-Ural'skiy gosudarstvennyy gumanitarno-pedagogicheskiy universitet ; Yuzhno-Ural'skiy nauchnyy tsentr Rossiyskoy akademii obrazovaniya, Chelyabinsk, 208 p. (In Russian).

6. Volobueva T.B. (2017), Superviziya v dopolnitel'nom pedagogicheskom obrazovanii: regional'naya model' [Supervision in additional pedagogical education: regional model] Nauchnoe obespechenie sistemy povysheniya kvalifikacii kadrov, 3 (32), 21–38. (In Russian).

7. Ovcharenko O.I. (2015) Modificirovannyj basket-metod kak sredstvo stanovleniya professional'noj kompetentnosti vypusknika v oblasti informacionnyh tekhnologij [Modified basket method as a means of developing professional competence of a graduate in the field of information technology]. Simvol nauki, 6. 277–278. (In Russian).

8. Gorky A.S. (2018), Gruppovaya refleksiya kak faktor effektivnosti sovmestnoj proizvodstvennoj deyatel'nosti [Group reflection as a factor of efficiency of joint production activities]. Vestnik Samarskogo universiteta. Ekonomika i upravlenie, 9, 3, 24–30. (In Russian).

9. Carter, SM & West, M (1998), “Reflexivity, effectiveness and mental health in BBC-TV production teams”, Small Group Research, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 583–601.

10. Baidenko V.I. (2006), Vyjavlenie sostava kompetenciy vypusknikov vuzov kak neobchodimy etap proektirovaniya Gosudarstvennogo obrazovatel'nogo standarta vysshego professional'nogo obrazovaniya novogo pokoleni (metodicheskoye posobiye) [Identification of the competencies of University graduates as a necessary stage in the design of the State educational standard of higher professional education of a new generation (A Methodological guide). Issledovatel'skiy tsentr problem kachestva podgotovki spetsialistov, Moscow, 72 p. (In Russian).

11. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia O., Richard J. Shavelson & Kuhn C. (2015), “The international state of research on measurement of competency in higher education”, Studies in Higher Education, 40:3, 393–411, DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2015.1004241.

12. Elistratova I.V.(2008), Sistema upravleniya kachestvom obrazovatelnogo protsessa [Quality management system of educational process]. Monografiya, Nizhnetagil'skaya gosudarstvennaya sotsial'no-pedagogicheskaya akademiya, Tagil, 167 p. (In Russian).