Herald SUrSHPU
The Herald of South-Ural state Humanities-Pedagogical University ЧГПУ

ISSN: 2618–9682; ISSN 1997-9886
Impact factor RSCI: 0,312

BACK TO ISSUE CONTENT | HERALD OF CSPU 2018 № 2 PEDAGOGICAL SCIENCES
SHOW FULL TEXT (IN RUSSIAN)
SHOW IN eLibrary
DOI: 10.25588/CSPU.2018.02.09
UDC: 378.147:681.14
BBC: 74.480.215:32.97
K.V. Kiuru ORCID
Academic Title of Professor, Doctor of Sciences (Philology), Professor at the Department of Journalism and Mass Communications, Chelyabinsk State University, Chelyabinsk, Russia
E-mail: Send an e-mail
E.E. Popova ORCID
Candidate of Sciences (Education), Associate Professor at Department of Pedagogy, Ural State University of Physical Education, Chelyabinsk, Russia
E-mail: Send an e-mail
Using digital content in higher education as a response to challenges of visual turn
Abstracts

Introduction. The article deals with the problem of finding the answer of the modern educational process to the challenges of the visual turn, manifested in the increasing role of the visual component of social reality. The visual turn leads to changes not only in learning and studying processes but in the very landscape of higher education. The purpose of the article is to consider two trends of the modern educational process in the university: the use of digital content (primarily visual) and the use of open educational resources.

Materials and methods. The main method of research is a survey conducted among students of Chelyabinsk State University and Ural State University of Physical Culture. The survey was conducted in two stages. At the first stage, the frequency of using visual technologies in the educational process was revealed. In the second stage, after the introduction of the pre-vodcasting method into the educational process, the effectiveness of the use of digital content was revealed.

Results. During the first stage of the study, it was found out that the idea of visual aids in the educational process was formed among the students of senior courses. Visualization tools are used in the educational process of the university, but not so often and not within the framework of all disciplines. The second stage of the study demonstrated that the students constantly use digital gadgets and are ready to use them in the educational process. The use of digital content within the framework of training sessions built on the principle of a “flipped class” made it possible to solve educational problems more effectively, which is confirmed by the respondents’ answers to the questions in the second survey.

Discussion. It is emphasized that the problem lies in the insufficient use of visualization and digital content by teachers in conditions of students’ readiness to receive information in this form.

Conclusion. It is concluded that the use of digital content in the educational process is a response to challenges of the visual turn which characterizes modern social reality and allows to solve the problem of personalizing of the learning space, which is one of the main trends of the education in the XXI century.

Keywords

educational process, digital content, open education, online education, visual aids, visual turn

Highlights
  • The main trends of the modern educational process are defined in the context of the visual turn.
  • The results of the study on the efficiency of the use of digital content in the educational process are presented.
  • The guidelines addressing the problem of insufficient use of visualization and digital content by teachers in conditions of students’ readiness to receive information in this form have been developed.
REFERENCES
  1. Mitchell W.J.T. (1994) The Picture Theory. Essays on Verbal and Visual Representation. Chicago; London, The University of Chicago Press.
  2. Bцhm G. (1994) Wiederkehr der Bilder. Was ist ein Bild. Mьnchen, Wilhelm Fink Verlag.
  3. Mirzoeff N. (1999) An Introduction to Visual Culture. London, NY, Routledge.
  4. Moxey K. (2008) Visual Studies and the Iconic Turn. Journal of Visual culture. 7 (2), 131–146. DOI 10.1177/1470412908091934.
  5. Savchuk S. (2008) Mediafilosofija: formirovanie discipliny [Mediophilosophy: formation of discipline] Sankt-Peterburg, Sankt-Peterburgskoe filosofskoe obshhestvo. (In Russian).
  6. D’Antoni S. (2006) The Virtual University: Models and Messages. Lessons from Case Studies. Paris.
  7. Carr N. (2010) The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains. New York and London, W.W. Norton and Co.
  8. Kramarenko N.S. (2016) Internet kak sociokul’turnoe prostranstvo zhizni i razvitija cheloveka [Internet as a sociocultural space for human life and development] Pedagogika. 3, 39–47. (In Russian).
  9. Maloshonok N.G. (2016) Vzaimosvjaz’ ispol’zovanija Interneta i mul’timedijnyh tehnologij v obrazovatel’nom processe so studencheskoj vovlechennost’ju [Interrelation between the use of the Internet and multimedia technologies in the educational process with student involvement] Voprosy obrazovanija. 4, 60–83. DOI 10.17323/1814-9545-2016-4-59-83. (In Russian).
  10. Avdeeva S.M. (2017) Otsenka informatsionnoy kompetentnosti uchatschikhsya: podhody, instrument, validnost’ i nadezhnost’ rezul’tatov [Assessment of students’ information competence: approaches, tools, validity and reliability of results] Voprosy obrazovanija. 4, 104–132. DOI 10.17323/1814-9545-2017-4-104-132. (In Russian).
  11. Kelli P. (2016) Onlayn-obrazovanie: put’ ot uchastija k uspehu [Online education: the path from participation to success] Voprosy obrazovanija. 3, 104–132. DOI 10.17323/1814-9545-2016-3-34-58. (In Russian).
  12. Coates H. (2006) Student Engagement in Campus-Based and Online Education: University Connections. London, Routledge.
  13. Clark J. (2008) PowerPoint and Pedagogy: Maintaining Student Interest in University Lectures. College Teaching. Vol. 56. No. 1, 39–44.
  14. Laird T. F.N., Kuh G. D. (2005) Student Experiences with Information Technology and their Relationship to Other Aspects of Student Engagement. Research in Higher Education. Vol. 46, 211–233.
  15. Junco R., Heiberger G., Loken E. (2011) The Effect of Twitter on College Student Engagement and Grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. Vol. 27, 119–132. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00387.
  16. Katz I.R. (2013) Testing Information Literacy in Digital Environments: ETS’s iSkills Assessment. Information Technology and Libraries. Vol. 26, 3–12.
  17. Katz I.R., Macklin A.S. (2007) Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Literacy: Integration and Assessment in Higher Education. Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics. Vol. 5, 50–55.
  18. Kiuru K.V., Popova E.E. (2016) Model’ formirovanija mediagramotnosti u molodezhi [Model of media literacy in young people] Alma mater. Vestnik vysshej shkoly. 10, 112–114. (In Russian).
  19. Kiuru K.V., Popova E.E. (2016) Mediagramotnost’ kak sociokul’turnaja problema: interaktivnye metody formirovanija [Media literacy as a sociocultural problem: interactive methods of formation] Vestnik Cheljabinskoj gosudarstvennoj akademii kul’tury i iskusstv. 3 (47), 61–65. (In Russian).
  20. Kiuru K.V., Popova E.E. (2016) Formirovanie mediakompetentnosti studentov v obrazovatel’nom processe vuza fizicheskoj kul’tury [Formation of media competence of students in the educational process of the university of physical culture] Teorija i praktika fizicheskoj kul’tury. 5, 30–32. (In Russian).