South Ural State Humanitarian Pedagogical University bulletin ЧГПУ

ISSN: 2618–9682
Impact factor RSCI: 0.236

SHOW IN eLibrary
DOI: 10.25588/CSPU.2018.03.25
UDC: 4
BBC: 81.000.0
N.A. Kurakina ORCID
Candidate of Sciences (Philology), Senior Lecturer of the Institute of the Humanities, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Kaliningrad, Russia.
E-mail: Send an e-mail
Linguistic means of manifestation of status-marked identity in complimentary utterances by the representatives of english and american linguacultures

Introduction. It becomes necessary to consider verbal manifestation of status-marked identity of interlocutors in language due to applicability of modern linguistic researches in social semiotics. Status-marked identity manifests itself in social status that represents different social roles that the speakers use in society via communication. The article examines the use of the English complimentary utterances by the representatives of different status-marked identities taking into account the situation of communication.

Materials and Methods. The aim of research influences on the choice of the following methodology, including the method of contextual analysis, the method of semantic and pragmatic interpretation, quantitative estimation. Complimentary utterances of the representatives of English and American linguacultures represented in modern fiction of the 21 century serve the material of research.

Results. It has been discovered that English and American complimentary utterances are used mainly in symmetrical situation of communication when the interlocutors obtain equal status-marked identities.

Discussion. The results of the study may be used in such courses as «Stylistics» and «Pragmalinguistics».

Conclusion. It has been revealed that the addressants of compliments use regardful mode of address and clichй models and do not use slangy expressions and different expressive means in asymmetrical situations of communication.


status-marked identity, horizontal social role, vertical social role, symmetrical situation of communication, asymmetrical situation of communication, complimentary utterances, English linguaculture, American linguaculture

  • verbal manifestation of status-marked identity is determined by social status marker;
  • the frequency of status-marked compliments depending on situation of communication has been identified;
  • the structural models of compliments has been elaborated and presented

1. Kravchenko A. (2002) Sociologija. Obshchij kurs [Sociology. General course] Moscow, PERSE, Logos Publ. (In Russian).

2. Gvazava V.I. (2010) Russkii rechevoi ehtiket: sociokul’turnyj aspekt [Russian speaking etiquette: sociocultural aspect] Kaliningrad, Sankt-Peterburgskaja akademija upravlenija i ehkonomiki. (In Russian).

3. Weaver S., Mora P.A., Morgan K. (2016) Gender and humour: examining discourses of hegemony and resistance. Social semiotics. 26 (3).

4. Linke G. (2012) Recent Scottish working-class autobiography. Social semiotics. 22 (2).

5. Soskina S.N., Kurakina N.A. (2014) Gendernye harakteristiki upotrebleniya komplimentarnih vyskazyvanii predstavitelyami angliiskoi, amerikanskoi i russkoi nacionalnyh identichnostey na materiale hudozhestvennyih tekstov XX-XXI vekov [Gender features in using compliments by the representatives of English, American and Russian national identities as exemplified in the literary texts of XX–XXI centuries] European Social Science Journal. 6 (45), 233–240. (In Russian).

6. Vahtin N.B., Golovko E.V. (2004) Sociolingvistika i sociologiya yazyka. Gender. Yazyk i vozrast: uchebnoe posobie [Sociolinguistics and sociology of language. Gender. Language and age] Saint Peterburg, Gumanitarnaya academiya Publ. (In Russian).

7. Kurakina N.A. (2015) Lingvostilisticheskie sredstva vyrazheniya vozrastnoj identichnosti v komplimentarnyh vyskazyvaniyah [The lingoustyilistic means of expressing age-related identity in complimentary phrases] Vestnik BFU im. I. Kanta. 2, 152–157. (In Russian).

8. Konetskaya V.P. (1997) Sociologiya kommunikacii: uchebnoe posobie [Sociology of communication] Moscow, Mezhdunarodnyi universitet Biznesa i Upravleniya Publ. (In Russian).

9. Fox K. (2004) Watching the English. The Hidden Rules of English Behaviour. Available from: http://ilmk.khspu.ru/?wpfb_dl=171 (Accessed 10th May 2018).

10. Messely L., Dessein J., Lauwers L. (2010) Regional identity in rural development: three case studies of regional branding. Applied studies in agribusiness and commerce. Vol. 4, 19–24.

11. Twigger-Ross C.L., Uzzell D.L. (1996), Place and Identity Processes. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 16, 205–220.

12. Arnn L.P. (2005) Constitution, Character, and National Identity. Heritage Lectures. 891, 1–10.

13.  Kurakina N.A. (2015) Linguistic means of expressing regional identity of the speaker in compliments (on the material of English-speaking lingua cultures). International Journal of English Language and Linguistics Research. 3 (4), 1–7.

14. Karasik V.I. (1992) Jazyk social’nogo statusa [The language of social status] Moscow, In-t jazykoznaniya RAN: Volgogr. gos. ped. in-t. Publ. (In Russian).

15. Searle J.R. (1979) Expression and meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. New York, CambridgeUniversity Press Publ.

16. Kurakina N.A. (2016) Pragmaticheskij aspekt gendernyh komplimentarnyh vyskazyvanij predstavitelej anglijskoj lingvokul’tury [Pragmatic aspects of gender-specific complimens in the English language culture] Vestnik BFU im. I. Kanta. 4, 35–41. (In Russian).

17. Barnes J. (2005) Arthur and George. Available from: http://www.e- reading.biz/bookreader.php/84985/Barnes_-_Arthur_%26_George.html (Accessed 10th May 2018).

18. Jardine Q. (1994) Skinner’s Trail. London, Headline Book Publ.

19. Stockett K. (2011) The Help. NewYork, The Berkley Publ.

20.  Steel, D. (2013), First Sight. London, Transworld Publ.