South Ural State Humanitarian Pedagogical University bulletin ЧГПУ

ISSN: 2618–9682
Impact factor RSCI: 0.236

SHOW IN eLibrary
DOI: 10.25588/CSPU.2018.12
UDC: 378.147
BBC: 74.480.215
I.А. Leontyeva ORCID
Senior Lecturer at the Department of Biology and Chemistry, Kazan Federal University, Yelabuga Institute, Yelabuga, Russia.
E-mail: Send an e-mail
F.G. Rebrina ORCID
Senior Lecturer at the Department of Biology and Chemistry, Kazan Federal University, Yelabuga Institute, Yelabuga, Russia.
E-mail: Send an e-mail
Distance e-learning courses for use in educational process at universities

Introduction. Remote education and electronic training courses have become the most urgent and widely demanded form of students’ education at universities for the last decade. Distance learning won huge popularity and became widely used along with traditional education forms.

Materials and Methods. The study uses SWOT-analysis method on the process of introducing distance e-learning courses in the pedagogical university students’ training system. The analysis involved identifying the strengths and the weaknesses of education with the use of EC. It also indicated external opportunities and threats to the mentioned educational approach.

Results. The authors suggest implementing distance learning through specific educational Internet portals created on the basis of educational institutions and performing it on the base of modern telecommunication technologies (on-line and off-line) without direct contact between the teacher and students.

Discussion. Is it possible to increase educational process quality by means of distance learning? What conditions and educational environment are necessary for performing such form of students’ training? The answer to these questions was received from the analysis of domestic and foreign scientists’ scientific publications and researches. From the practical point of view, the remote electronic training courses were organized at the Faculty of Math and Natural Sciences at Elabuga Institute of Kazan Federal University (EI KFU). This experience of remote education is also generalized and presented in the paper.

Conclusion. SWOT-analysis of distance e-learning revealed the advantages of mixed education against traditional (face-to-face) or solely e-learning conducted offline and online.


e-learning course, classroom work, blended learning, learning model, “flipped class” training model, higher-education system, students’ training

  • The paper presents the review of the remote teaching systems widely used nowadays;
  • The SWOT- analysis of the remote education system based on e-learning training courses is carried out by the authors;
  • The authors define and describe the strengths and the weaknesses of remote education;
  • The risks of implementing distance learning in higher-education system are also mentioned in the paper.

 1. Bonk C., Graham C. (2005) Handbook of blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs. San Francisco, Pfeiffer Publishing.

2. Sukhanova N.T. (2016) Jelektronnoe obuchenie v vuze: Otsenka kachestva jelektronnykh resursov [Electronic training in higher education institution: assessment of electronic courses quality] Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya. 52-6. 302–309 (In Russian).

3. Shurygin V.Y., Krasnova L.A. (2016) Electronic learning courses as a means to activate students’ independent work in studying physics. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education. 11(8). 1743–1751.DOI: 10.12973/ijese.2016.551a

4. Burns M. (2013) Distance Education for Teacher Training: Modes, Models and Methods. Available from: http://idd.edc.org/sites/idd.edc.org/files/DE%20Book-final.pdf (Accessed 12 April 2018).

5. King E., Boyatt R. (2015) Exploring factors that influence adoption of e-learning within higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology. 46 (6), 1272–1280. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bjet.12195 (Accessed 23 April 2018).

6. Mashin V.N. (2013) Distantsionnoe obuchenie kak odin iz faktorov realizatsii kompetentnostnogo podkhoda [Distance learning as one of the factors of realization of competence approach] Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. 9 (5-2), 69–71 (In Russian).

7. Bakharev M.S., Nagayeva S.N. (2016) Stepen’ gotovnosti prepodavatelya k realizatsii distantsionnogo obucheniya [Degree of the teacher’s readiness for implementing distance learning] Jelektronnoe obrazovanie: perspektivy ispol’zovaniya SMART tekhnologiy: Materials of the III International scientific and practical videoconference. Tyumen, TSOGU. 22–24 (In Russian).

8. Shabanov A.G. (2009) Distantsionnoe obuchenie v usloviyakh nepreryvnogo obrazovaniya: problemy i perspektivy razvitiya [Distance learning in continuous education: problems and prospects of development] Moscow, SSU Publishing house. (In Russian).

9. Belko E.S. (2016) Ispol’zovanie jelektronnykh obuchayutschikh kursov pri organizatsii samostoyatel’noy raboty studentov [Use of the electronic training courses in the process of organizing students’ independent work] Yaroslavsky pedagogichesky vestnik. 1. 107–112 (In Russian).

10. Tayzetdinova A.G. (2016) Analiz avtomatizirovannykh system distantsionnogo obucheniya [The analysis of distance learning automated systems] Innovatsioonoe razvitie professional’nogo obrazovaniya. 2 (10), 32–38 (In Russian).

11. Medvedev D.A., Mangusheva L.S. (2016) Sistema distantsionnogo obucheniya Web Tutor [Web Tutor system of distance learning] Analiz i sovremennye informatsionnye tekhnologii v obespechenii jekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti biznesa i gosudarstva. 504–506 (In Russian).

12. Fenske A.V., Fenske D.O. (2012) Systemy distantsionnogo obucheniya [Distance learning systems]. Molodjozhny nauchno-tekhnichesky vestnik. 12, 1–11. (In Russian). Available from: http://ainsnt.ru/doc/522011.html (Accessed 8 February 2018).

13. Leontyeva I.A., Rebrina F.G. (2017) From the Experience in Creating an Effective Model of Blended Learning. Revista ESPACIOS. 38 (62). Available from: http://www.revistaespacios.com/a17v38n62/17386217.html (Accessed 23 April 2018).

14. Cole J., Foster H. (2008) Using Moodle. Teaching with the Popular Open Source Course Management System. Sevastopol, O’Reilly Media.

15. Khadiullina R.R., Galyautdinov M.I. (2014) Conceptual foundations of distance learning in the institutes of higher physical education. Teoriya i Praktika Fizicheskoy Kultury. (4), 57–60. (In Russian).

16. Abrami P.C., Bernard R.M., Bures E.M., Borokhovski E., Tamim R.M. (2012) Interaction of distance education and online learning: Using evidence and theory to improve practice. The Next Generation of Distance Education: Unconstrained Learning, 9781461417859, 49–69.

17. West E.R. (2011) Insights from research on distance education learners, learning, and learner support. American Journal of Distance Education. 25 (3), 135–148.

18. Nedhal Al S., Intisar Al S. (2011) Multimedia Distance E-Learning System. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235962786_Multimedia_Distance_E-Learning_System_for_Higher_Education_Students (Accessed 23 April 2018). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-22389-1_32

19. Maheridou M., Antoniou P., Kourtessis T., Avgerinos A. (2011) Blogs in distance education: An analysis of physical educators’ perceptions of learning. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education. 12 (1), 95–107.

20. Altunay D. (2013) Language learning activities of distance EFL learners in the Turkish open education system as the indicator of their learner autonomy. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 14 (4), 296–307.

N-US style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:EN-US'>20. Altunay D. (2013) Language learning activities of distance EFL learners in the Turkish open education system as the indicator of their learner autonomy. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 14 (4), 296–307.