Herald SUrSHPU
The Herald of South-Ural state Humanities-Pedagogical University ЧГПУ

ISSN: 2618–9682; ISSN 1997-9886
Impact factor RSCI: 0,312

BACK TO ISSUE CONTENT | HERALD OF CSPU 2018 № 7 Pedagogical sciences
SHOW FULL TEXT (IN RUSSIAN)
SHOW IN eLibrary
DOI: 10.25588/CSPU.2019.58..7..006
UDC: 37.013.46
BBC: 74.02
V. V. Drozina ORCID
Professor, Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor of the Department of Mathematics, Natural Sciences and Methods of Teaching Mathematics and Natural Science, South-Ural state Humanities-Pedagogical university
E-mail: Send an e-mail
N. A. Klyuchko ORCID
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Assistant of the Department of Eye Diseases, South-Ural state medical university
E-mail: Send an e-mail
CREATIVITY AS A FUNDAMENTAL COMPONENT OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY
Abstracts

Introduction. The article is devoted to the analysis of the correlation of creativity and the economy of knowledge. The most important factor in the prosperity of Russia is a post-industrial society, the basis of which is people whose creativity is associated with the knowledge economy.

Purpose. Identify the features of the ratio of the economy of knowledge and creativity and identify a number of tools that are aimed at solving the issue of the relationship of the economy of knowledge and creativity in teaching.

Materials and methods. Used methods of theoretical level. The study, analysis of scientific research of creative activity in the field of pedagogy, physiology, economics. Research methods: observation, analysis of statistics, study of the media, literature.

Results. Identified a number of aspects of the relationship of creativity and the economy of knowledge. Given the direction of the formation of their relationship.

Discussion. In the development of an innovative economy and the economy of knowledge, the leading role is played by a person with his intellect, innovations, knowledge that he has acquired, a profession.

 

The knowledge economy is one of the types of economics in which knowledge is the basis, and its application is the source of progress. The formation and development of creativity should be associated with elements of the social structure of society.

Conclusion It is concluded that the creativity of the individual, forming and developing in close connection with the social structure of society contributes to the progress of the post-industrial society.

Keywords

Innovative economy, creativity, human capital, knowledge economy

Highlights

- developed by elements of the relationship of creativity and the economy of knowledge;

- methodical directions have been established that contribute to the realization of the relationship between the economy of knowledge.

REFERENCES

1. Tihonova N.E. (2014) Social'naya struktura Rossii: teorii i real'nost [The social structure of Russia: theory and reality]. Moscow, «Novyj Hrono-graf». 403 p.

2. Antip'ev A.G. (2010) Sovremennoe Rossijskoe obshchestvo i ego social'naya struktura [Modern Russian society and its social structure]. Vestnik Permskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 1, 56-66. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/v/sovremennoe-rossiyskoe-obschestvo-i-ego-sotsialnaya-struktura (Accessed: 07.10.2018). (In Russian).

3. Najdenova L., Vostroknutov E. V., Osipova N. V. (2017) Tendencii i prognozy nekotoryh novyh izmenenij v social'noj strukture sovremennogo rossijskogo obshchestva [Trends and forecasts of some new changes in the social structure of modern Russian society]. Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij. Povolzhskij region. Obshchestvennye nauki. News of higher educational institutions. Volga region. 3 (43). – P. 138-147. (In Russian).

4. Gavrilova I.V., Zaharova K.V., Malashchenkova T. A. (2016) Ponyatie i harakteristika ehkonomiki znanij, neobhodimye usloviya ee formirovaniya [The concept and characteristics of the knowledge economy, the necessary conditions for its formation]. Molodoj uchenyj. 10, 655-659. (In Russian).

5. Makarov V.L. (2003) Ekonomika znanij: uroki dlya Rossii [Knowledge economy: lessons for Russia]. Vestn. Ros. akad. Nauk. 73, 5, 450-456. (In Russian).

6. Boer G.C., Opdenakker M.C., Minnaert A.E. Teacher Strategies to Motivate Gifted Students: A Multiple Case Study on Teacher Behavior. Teaching Gifted and Talented Children in A New Educational Era. University of Primorska Press. 2018. 75-98.

7. Blonskij P.P. (2016) Psihologiya i pedagogika. Izbrannye trudy [Psychology and pedagogy. Selected works]. Moscow, "Yurait". 164 p. (In Russian).

 

8. Il'in E.P. (2009) Psihologiya tvorchestva, kreativnosti, odarennosti [Psychology of creativity, creativity, talent]. SPb., Peter. 448 p. (In Russian).

9. Lejtes N. S. (2003) Vozrastnaya odarennost' i individual'nye razlichiya [Age giftedness and individual differences]. Moscow, MODEK, MPSI. 464 p. (In Russian).

10. Tallibulina M. T. (2016) Psihologicheskie issledovaniya odarennosti: sbornik statej [Psychological study of giftedness: a collection of articles]. Moscow, Berlin. Direkt-Media, 236 p. (In Russian).

11. Papadopoulos D (2016) Psycho-Pedagogical and Educational Aspects of Gifted Students, Starting from the Preschool Age; How Can Their Needs Be Best Met? J Psychol Abnorm 5,153. DOI: 10.4172/2471- 9900.1000153.

12. Ermolaeva-Tomina L. B. (2005) Psihologiya hudozhestvennogo tvorchestva [Psychology of artistic creativity]. Moscow, Akademicheskij proekt: Kul'tura, 304 p. (In Russian).

13. DrozinaV. V., Dil'manV. L., Drozin D. A. (2016) Kak nauchit' mladshih shkol'nikov reshat' nestandartnye zadachi (Grif NMS MOiN RF): rukovodstvo dlya tekh, kto hochet nauchit' mladshih shkol'nikov reshat' olimpiadnye zadachi [How to teach junior schoolchildren to solve non-standard tasks (Grief NMS MOiN RF): a guide for those who want to teach younger students to solve the olympiad problems]. Moscow, URSS. 240 p. (In Russian).

14. Belousova N.A., Grigor'eva E.V., Drozina V.V., Mamylina N.V., Mahmutova L.G., Osolodkova E.V., Titarenko N. N., Hudyakova M. A. (2015) Podgotovka uchitelej i studentov k innovacionnym processam v realizacii Federal'nyh gosudarstvennyh obrazovatel'nyh standartov [Training teachers and students to innovation processes in the implementation of Federal state educational standards.]. Monographiya. Penza, Akademiya Estestvoznaniya. 176 p. (In Russian).

15. Belousova N.A., Mamylina N.V., Bobyleva L.V. (2015) Ocenka psihologicheskoj adaptacii studentov k kognitivnoj nagruzke [Assessment of psychological adaptation of students to cognitive load]. Sb. nauchnyh statej po itogam nauch-no-issledovatel'skoj raboty za 2015 g. "Fundamental'naya i prikladnaya nauka". Chelyabinsk, Izd-vo CHelyab. gos. ped. un-ta. 16-19. (In Russian).

16. Shcheblanova E. I. (2018) Koncepciya A. M. Matyushkina o tvorcheskoj odarennosti kak predpo-sylke razvitiya tvorcheskoj lichnosti [Concept of Matyushkin on creative talent as a prere- quisite for the development of creative personality]. Izv. Sarat. un-ta. Nov. ser. Ser. Akmeologiya obrazovaniya. Psihologiya razvitiya. 7, 1 (25), 26-29. DOI: 10.18500/2304-9790-2018-7-1-26-29. (In Russian).

17. Shumakova N. B. (2014) Sistema razvitiya detej s obshchej odarennost'yu [Development system children General gifts]. Proc. Differencionno-integracionnaya teoriya razvitiya (pod red. N.I. CHuprikovoj, E.V. Volkovoj). M. 2, 645-658. (In Russian).

18. Shumpeter I. A. (2007) Teoriya ehkonomicheskogo razvitiya. Kapitalizm, socializm i demokratiya [The Theory of economic development. Capitalism, socialism and democracy]. Moscow. Eksmo. 864 p.

19. Shumpeter I. A. (2001) Istoriya ehkonomicheskogo analiza [History of economic analysis]. SPb. Ekono-micheskaya shkola. 552 p. (In Russian).

20. Joseph S. Renzulli. Theory Into Practice, Vol. 44, No. 2, Gifted Education (Spring, 2005), pp. 80-89 Published by: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. Stable Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3497026 (Accessed: 05.10.18).